home  bbs  files  messages ]

      ZZUK4448             uk.legal.moderated             12811 messages      

[ previous | next | reply ]

[ list messages | list forums ]

  Msg # 12679 of 12811 on ZZUK4448, Sunday 8-16-25, 7:55  
  From: ROGER HAYTER  
  To: JETHRO_UK@HOTMAILBIN.COM  
  Subj: Re: Being forced to lie on forms ?  
 From: roger@hayter.org 
  
 On 16 Aug 2025 at 15:07:32 BST, "Jethro_uk"  
 wrote: 
  
 > Recently registered with a job site. 
 > 
 > Thanks to it's "curated" approach, I am unable to enter the establishment 
 > where I got my degree. 
 > 
 > It doesn't allow you to add to the list or provide space for "other". The 
 > only way to proceed is to enter one of it's listed places. 
 > 
 > Assuming this outfit were to advance me to an employer who selects me for 
 > consideration and potentially employment, and assuming I tell the truth 
 > (if possible) when commencing employment, would there be any issues ? 
 > 
 > Is there any general legal principle when very bad (or more often US) 
 > design results in someone being required to lie to advance an automated 
 > process ? Or is the strict legal answer that if you cannot answer the 
 > question truthfully, you are excluded from the process ? 
  
 If you cannot answer the question truthfully, you are excluded from the 
 process. 
  
 There must be some side channel you can communicate with them, or leave the 
 question blank. Lying on this form could be anything from an embarrassment 
 to 
 a criminal offence if you gain employment as a result. And it might prove 
 difficult to show that you corrected it informally. Perhaps they 
 deliberately 
 want to confine consideration to certain nationalities? 
  
  
 -- 
  
 Roger Hayter 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) 

[ list messages | list forums | previous | next | reply ]

search for:

328,076 visits
(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca