XPost: uk.politics.misc, uk.d-i-y, uk.radio.amateur 
 From: dave@davenoise.co.uk 
  
 In article <0001HW.2354EC920022600370000DC772EF@news.giganews.com>, 
    Keema's Nan  wrote: 
 > > > He said it wouldn't be the end of the matter. He didn't say he and 
 > > > all his supporters would have tantrums and do their level best to 
 > > > interfere with the democratic process. Personally, I would have 
 > > > accepted the result until further information or material change 
 > > > came to light that justified the issue being reopened. 
 > > 
 > > Have you a short memory? After the referendum, we had a general 
 > > election. With May asking the country for a decent majority to carry 
 > > out Brexit. And she ended up with no real working majority. And UKIP 
 > > decimated. 
  
 > And can you quote the sections in the party manifestos which stated that 
 > from a legal and constitutional point of view the election result would 
 > nullify the referendum result? 
  
 Why would a Tory government intent in securing a decent Brexit have 
 anything like that in its manifesto? 
  
 Just pointing out to all you will of the people types that the leave side 
 didn't give the Tories what they asked for. 
  
 -- 
 *If a parsley farmer is sued, can they garnish his wages? 
  
     Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW 
                   To e-mail, change noise into sound. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)