XPost: talk.politics.guns 
 From: mejercit@hotmail.com 
  
 "Peeler"  wrote in message news:ejHnF.803045$R83.203555@usenetxs.com... 
  
 >UNBELIEVABLE, but our resident pedophilic cocksucking serb swine just 
 >finished sucking off her SECOND gay neo-nazi gang, today! LOL 
  
 >Listen to her trying (and failing) to talk with a FRESH big load of jizz in 
 >her filthy cocksucking serbian gob: 
  
 >> But KEEP a LISHT sho you can remember what to ATONE for NEXT jew new 
 >> year! 
 >> 
 >> You know what I'm shayin'? 
 >>  
  
 >THAT's the sound she makes when she squeezes the jizz to and fro between 
 >her 
 >rotten serbian teeth! 
  
 >> Butt REGARDLESSH!....let'sh CONTINUE with the MERCILESSH and 
 >> RELENTLESSH  GOOGLEFUCKING of: 
 >> Your, circumcished jew shishter Suzan F. Binder and her 
 >> circumcished jew hubby Marc W. Binder 
 >> Your, circumcished shitshke 'wife' Mary E. Riendeau Shein 
 >> Your, shenile circumcished jew mum Annie Shein (SHOOSH!) 
 >> Your, circumcished jew shub-uncle Hyman Shein (POP!) 
 >> Your, circumcished jew dad Shaul (LOLOK) Shein (zt"l/a"h since 1992) 
 >> and LASHT butt not LEASHT your, shubcherry-popped circumcished jew 
 >> shubnephew Zachary G. Binder! 
 >> 
 >> And who the fuck is Isidore (Izzy) Shein???  Googlefuck him anyway! 
  
 >If she only swallowed it BEFORE she started talking! 
  
 >Why, oh WHY, are ALL you nazis, ALWAYS, without ANY exception, such 
 >INSATIABLE COCKSUCKERS? LOL 
  
 >Yeah, WHY, gay anal Razovic? 
    The mangina just likes the taste. 
  
    Now here is Judith Bergman writing about the UK's subversive guidance for 
 jounralists. 
  
 UK: New Subversive "Guidance" for Journalists 
 by Judith Bergman 
 October 9, 2019 at 5:00 am 
  
 Send 
 Print 
  
 Share279 
 Policy Exchange's report on the leaked guidance gives rise for concern. In 
 the words of the report, the guidance, "seems designed to bind the hands of 
 UK newspapers when it comes to reporting on stories relating to Islam and 
 Muslims €€€ with potentially serious long-term consequences for the workings 
 of a free and independent press". €€€ Policy Exchange Report, "Eroding the 
 Free Press," by Will Heaven and Sir John Jenkins. 
  
 As the Policy Exchange authors write, "In all of this, there seems to be a 
 suggestion that journalists should take a different approach to covering 
 Muslims than that employed towards other faith groups. This all seems 
 remarkably ill-conceived. If we ruled out reporting on matters specific to 
 Muslims not only would we miss some big issues €€€ not least the threat from 
 Islamist extremist terrorism, which continues to dwarf other global 
 terrorist threats €€€ but we would also be unable to report properly on 
 discrimination against Muslims. More generally, we must ask: is it really 
 the role of journalists to consider community cohesion before truth and 
 accuracy? And what are the potential consequences of such an ethos?" €€€ 
 Policy Exchange Report, "Eroding the Free Press," by Will Heaven and Sir 
 John Jenkins. 
  
 "As Policy Exchange has previously pointed out, one of the things that makes 
 the APPG's attempts to institutionalise an illiberal definition of 
 Islamophobia so unpalatable, is the fact that it resembles a form of 
 blasphemy law, protecting Islam specifically, implemented by the back 
 door". €€€ Policy Exchange Report, "Eroding the Free Press," by Will Heaven 
 and Sir John Jenkins. 
  
 "Taken as a whole, the IPSO guidance document seems to mark a decisive shift 
 in the purpose of the regulator €€€ which takes it beyond considerations of 
 accuracy or discrimination, as per the Editor's Code. Instead, it is moving 
 into the realm of 'insensitivities' and 'unbalanced coverage' €€€ elastic 
 and 
 subjective terms". €€€ Policy Exchange Report, "Eroding the Free Press," by 
 Will Heaven and Sir John Jenkins. 
  
  
 For the eroding of the freedom of the press in Britain, the question seems 
 not so much to be "if" as "to what degree". (Image source: iStock) 
  
 The British think-tank Policy Exchange, recently published a report, Eroding 
 the Free Press, about a leaked draft of "Guidance for Reporting on Islam and 
 Muslims". The guidance was drafted by the Independent Press Standards 
 Organisation (IPSO)[1], the UK's independent press regulator, an initiative 
 that IPSO announced in late 2018. In the past, IPSO has, among other issues, 
 published guidance on the reporting of death and inquests, sexual offences, 
 suicides, and transgender people. According to IPSO, its guidance is 
 "designed to support editors and journalists" and "does not limit or 
 restrict editorial decision making, but may inform that decision making". 
  
 In a January 2019 blog on IPSO's main priorities for 2019, IPSO Head of 
 Standards Charlotte Urwin laid out the five priorities of the year. 
 "Reporting of Islam and Muslims" was listed as the first priority and 
 described in the following way: 
  
 "In October 2018, we began working towards producing guidance for 
 journalists on the reporting of Islam and Muslims in the UK, an area of 
 broad political and social concern. The guidance will help journalists to 
 report on a sensitive area, whilst also ensuring that it does not impinge 
 their right to criticise, challenge or stimulate debate. We have established 
 an informal working group to help us draft the guidance, bringing together 
 academics who have research experience in relation to Islam and Muslims in 
 the UK and representatives of organisations interested in the coverage of 
 Islam..." 
  
 Policy Exchange's report on the leaked guidance gives rise for concern. In 
 the words of the report[2], the guidance, "seems designed to bind the hands 
 of UK newspapers when it comes to reporting on stories relating to Islam and 
 Muslims €€€ with potentially serious long-term consequences for the workings 
 of a free and independent press". 
  
 According to the Policy Exchange report, the draft IPSO guidance states: 
  
 "Journalists should be aware that their content can have an impact on the 
 wider community and on how minority communities are treated. Inaccuracies 
 and insensitivities can damage communities and prevents their accurate 
 representation. They can also contribute to members of communities feeling 
 divorced from, or misunderstood, by the media. Finally, inaccuracies and 
 unbalanced coverage can work to increase tension between communities, which 
 can make harassment more likely". 
  
  
 [continued in next message] 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)