XPost: uk.politics.misc, uk.d-i-y, uk.radio.amateur
From: jenningsltd@fastmail.fm
On 13/10/2019 05:36, Tim Streater wrote:
> In article , JNugent
> wrote:
>
>> On 12/10/2019 23:47, ZakJames wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "JNugent" wrote in message
>>> news:h0f0boF6deiU1@mid.individual.net...
>
>>>> But unless they're allowed to vote in UK Parliamentary elections -
>>>> for life - they are disenfranchised from having any say in the
>>>> government of anywhere. And that cannot be right. They are not
>>>> second-class people who should have fewer rights than others.
>>>
>>> That€€€s always been the case with those who choose not
>>> to take up citizenship in the place they choose to move
>>> to. They are in fact second class people by that choice
>>> and rightly so imo.
>>
>> "That's always been the case".
>>
>> But it shouldn't be. There is no case to be made for disenfranchising
>> anyone.
>
> Yes there is. There's no case for allowing them to vote for elections
> in somewhere where they don't live.
Why not?
Explain why any citizen should be completely disenfranchised (other then
your suspicion that they won't vote the "right" way, I mean).
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|