XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.california 
 From: fsmith@emuybcpl.net 
  
 Stan de SD wrote: 
  
 > "Fritz"  wrote in message 
 > news:3F328F8D.B557AEC8@emuybcpl.net... 
 > > Stan de SD wrote: 
 > > 
 > > > "Ward Stewart"  wrote in message 
 > > > news:jetuiv8ooi8cuis4cfoonak0sad0rmb1rk@4ax.com... 
 > > > > On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 03:40:49 GMT, "Stan de SD" 
 > > > >  wrote: 
 > > > > > 
 > > > > > wrote in message 
 > > > > >news:691e612a4442a03cb79256938e5af969@free.teranews.com... 
 > > > > >> 
 > > > > >> Even if homosexuals win the right to same-sex marriage, they will 
 > > > > >> continue to seek multiple partnerships. Homosexual Andrew Sullivan 
 > is 
 > > > > >> the senior editor at The New Republic. In his book, Virtually 
 > Normal, 
 > > > > >> Sullivan says that straight society will learn a lot from 
 > homosexual 
 > > > > >> marriages if they are legalized. He notes that straights will 
 learn 
 > to 
 > > > > >> have a greater "understanding of the need for extramarital outlets 
 > > > > >> between two men than between a man and a woman." In other words, 
 > > > > >> homosexuals have no intention of remaining monogamous to each 
 > other. 
 > > > > >> Sullivan criticizes what he calls the "stifling model of 
 > heterosexual 
 > > > > >> normality." 
 > > > > >> 
 > > > > >> Homosexual activist Michelangelo Signorile has openly called for 
 > the 
 > > > > >> abolition of marriage and family as we know it. According to 
 > > > > >> Signorile, writing in Out magazine, homosexuals should "fight for 
 > > > > >> same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, 
 redefine 
 > > > > >> the institution of marriage completely. . . . to debunk the myth 
 > and 
 > > > > >> radically alter an archaic institution. . . . The most subversive 
 > > > > >> action lesbians and gays can undertake--and one that would perhaps 
 > > > > >> benefit all of society--is to transform the notion of 'family' 
 > > > > >> entirely." 
 > > > > > 
 > > > > >In other words, militant queers want it both ways - they want 
 > "inclusion" 
 > > > > >into the same social institutions they are hell-bent on destroying. 
 > They 
 > > > > >sound just like the malcontent teenager who says he really doesn't 
 > want 
 > > > to 
 > > > > >go to the party, but wants an invitation so badly merely so he can 
 > > > disrupt 
 > > > > >it. :O| 
 > > > > > 
 > > > > Dim witted and nasty too -- a poisonous combination. 
 > > > > 
 > > > > Is it that you imagine that ALL Gays must have the SAME opinions? 
 > > > 
 > > > No. Do you consider my reference to "militant queers" equivalent to 
 "all 
 > > > gays"? 
 > > > 
 > > > > Michael Signorile and I (for instance) have entirely divergent views 
 > > > > in the matter of marriage. 
 > > > > 
 > > > > Can you suppose that we have all subscribed to the :agenda" you fret 
 > > > > so over and we all toe the mark on every issue? 
 > > > > 
 > > > > Pathetic! 
 > > > 
 > > > What's "pathetic" is your demonstrably poor reading comprehension 
 skill. 
 > > > Nowhere do I refer to all gays - you deliberately misread what I say so 
 > you 
 > > > can berate me about it. Fucking asshole (no pun intended...) 
 > > 
 > > That sounds very like berating. 
 > > 
 > > I don't understand Stan, are you saying that it's ok for you and 
 > > not someone else? Sounds like a double standard to me. 
 > 
 > You can be the sick perverted fuck to your heart's content with another 
 > consenting adult in your own home, and I really don't give a shit. Where 
 you 
 > get yourselves into deep shit (again, no pun intended) is your fanatical 
 > desire to force the rest of us to accept your "lifestyle choices" as 
 > acceptable and desirable. 
  
 Don't get so excited Stan, nobody is trying to force you to do any 
 thing. It's more like you lot are trying to force gays to do things 
 your way. 
  
 -- 
    Fritz 
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
    Taking back my freedom of conscience. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)