XPost: alt.conspiracy, ba.general, la.general 
 XPost: soc.culture.jewish 
 From: reniggade@anglicam.org 
  
 On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 03:55:02 +0000 (UTC), Merlin Dorfman 
  wrote: 
  
 >The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe (reniggade@anglicam.org) wrote: 
 >: On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 23:52:40 +0000 (UTC), Merlin Dorfman 
 >:  wrote: 
 > 
 >.. 
 > 
 >: >: >: >: Many. 
 >: >: >: > 
 >: >: >: >     Few. 
 >: >: >: >     Prove me wrong. 
 >: >: > 
 >: >: >: Many. 
 >: >: >: Prove me wrong. 
 >: >: > 
 >: >: >     You made the accusation.  Prove it or give it up. 
 >: > 
 >: >: You made the counter-assertion.  Prove yours. 
 >: > 
 >: >     You are right.  I have failed to prove my assertion and it is 
 >: >just as unproven as yours. 
 > 
 >: There you are, then.  Mine is, however, intuitively more plausible. 
 > 
 >     I apologize for letting this ridiculous assertion go for so long. 
  
 You may also apologise for all your other ridiculous assertions. 
  
 >Yours is intuitively and logically very implausible.  It is 
 >completely implausible that an entire ethnic group is congenital 
 >liars and criminals. 
  
 On the contrary, it is quite plausible.  Especially, as in the case of 
 jews, when that race has recognised congenital character deficiencies. 
  
 Here's another example:  how many muggers in your host country are 
 white? 
  
 >  It is much more plausible that the inherited 
 >criminal tendencies of all ethnic groups are quite similar to each 
 >other; that there will not be a great difference in the hereditary 
 >criminal tendencies of any one such group compared to any other 
 >group.  A claim to the contrary is highly implausible and non- 
 >intuitive, and thus requires convincing proof. 
  
 Absolute nonsense.  The very idea that jews are no more prone to 
 crimes of a financial nature than other races is not only 
 counter-intuitive, it is completely absurd. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)