home  bbs  files  messages ]

      ZZNY4436             nyc.general             32000 messages      

[ previous | next | reply ]

[ list messages | list forums ]

  Msg # 31926 of 32001 on ZZNY4436, Thursday 9-28-22, 11:26  
  From: NIGHTWRITER  
  To: ALL  
  Subj: Re: Proof of intend (1/3)  
 222b6f93 
 XPost: calgary.general, can.general, tor.general 
 XPost: chi.general, wash.general 
 From: nightwriter@hotmail.com 
  
 sorry to top post, but this was all confirmed today when the purported osama 
 bin laden tape called for the complete taking back of palestinian land - 
 israel.  now, i'm no osama apologist, but i can see that, hey, we remove our 
 troops from your country, you stop terrorism in ours... that sounds like a 
 good deal.  but to then throw in 'and israel gets demolished' basically, is 
 obscene and ridiculous and puts the other requests (withdraw troops) in a 
 pitiful light.  it's clear he has delusions of grandeur.  i hope they invent 
 nuclear arrowheads and they can just send little baby-nukes into the caves 
 and eliminate this bastard. 
  
  
  
 "Seven of 3"  wrote in message 
 news:kPofc.141146$SQE.86461@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com... 
 > 
 > "nightwriter"  wrote in message 
 > news:Ewcfc.138012$SQE.130914@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com... 
 > > 
 > > "Jeffrey E. Salzberg"  wrote in message 
 > > news:MPG.1ae7199ed790d60f9896b0@news.comcast.giganews.com... 
 > > > In article , 
 > > > defenderofenourmousmanhood@rogers.com says... 
 > > > > The question was actually rhetorical, and meant for Veranda. 
 > > > 
 > > > I know, but it didn't hurt for her to see a sane person's answer. 
 > > > 
 > > > 
 > > > > We know it ain't for the Oil - there isn't any - nor the gold - 
 there 
 > > isn't 
 > > > > any, nor the lush green meadows - there isn't any. 
 > > > 
 > > > Interesting that in Israel, there are...although there didn't used to 
 > > > be.  The Palestinians could do that, too, but don't. 
 > > 
 > > because they aren't funded to the tune of billions of dollars every year 
 > by 
 > > the US, perhaps?? 
 > 
 > I guarantees yes, free money no! 
 > 
 > > 
 > > > 
 > > > 
 > > > > Where in the world can you just kill innocent people in the street 
 and 
 > > not 
 > > > > be considered a crime? 
 > > > 
 > > > For that matter, if Israel were note a primarily Jewish state, no one 
 > > > would be questioning their right to defend themselves. 
 > > 
 > > bullshit.  this is not some form of subtle anti-semitism.  people in the 
 > > west are wrapped up in the Israeli conflict because we a) helped to 
 create 
 > > it  b) help israel  c)  realize the palestinian/israeli conflict has at 
 > > least a little something to do with anti-western sentiment among 
 > terrorists. 
 > 
 > 
 > We did not create the Palestinian conflict. Jews have been living in 
 > Palestine almost since the Roman's destroyed Israel. 
 > In the 1800's Jewish settlers, Zionist flocked to the Biblical lands. They 
 > lived in relative peace and harmony with the people's of the area. They 
 > bought land, and built homes. I suppose as their numbers grew, and they 
 > became adamant about establishing a homeland that was the beginning of the 
 > conflict. No West. 
 > 
 > Then the League of Nations with the help of the Brits gave lands they 
 > occupied to Israel to establish a homeland. It was a very tiny slice of 
 > barren desert. Much smaller than the Biblical Israel. There was no 
 > Palestine. The country was Canaan. Palestine was that same area, named as 
 > Palestine as part of the Ottman Turk Empire from 1516-1917, and a British 
 > Mandate 1923-1948. Before 1516 there was no Palestine. Originally the 
 Brits 
 > were going to give Palestine to Israel, but backed out and gave them only 
 a 
 > small peice of baren desert. 
 > 
 > From the very day they became independant is when the Arabs vowed that 
 > Israel had no right to exist and would destroy it, and began to fight. So 
 in 
 > that sense, I suppose you can say the West helped to create it - the 
 > conflict, and Israel, thought "the West" is really a term that began with 
 > the cold war. And it was really Europe - North America had little to do 
 with 
 > it. 
 > 
 > And put things into perspective. The West was riddled with guilt after the 
 > war. When boats full Jewish refugees came into their ports looking for 
 > refuge, they were denied, and most perished at sea. Combined with the 
 > atrocities they suffered, and the lack of humanity they received from the 
 > West, the West felt duty bound to give them a homeland in their ancient 
 > lands. Of course the anti-semites liked the idea too - it meant that Jews 
 > would leave their countries to return to their homeland. 
 > 
 > Palestine was a non-issue until the 6 day war in 1967. That was when 
 Israel 
 > got sick of being so easily attacked, and decided to take land, strategic 
 > lands so they could effectively defend their country from armies. 
 > Palestinians tried to flee to neighbouring Arab nations, and were turned 
 > back. since world war II it has been illegal for nations to expand their 
 > borders by war. 
 > 
 > Israel's occupation is illegal, and there are several UN resolutions that 
 > say so. But No Arab nation has marched any armies on Israel since. And 
 that 
 > is not because of good will. That is because Israel is formidable, and 
 with 
 > the strategic lands under their control, any attack would just be a 
 > massacre, a lost cause of Arab slaughter. So for the reasons the land was 
 > taken has proved to be the right decision. From war every few years to no 
 > war in 40 years it proves that taking the lands brough security from 
 > military threat. 
 > 
 > The Arab position has mostly been, and I beleive still is - that Israel 
 has 
 > no right to exist and should be destroyed - though over the decades there 
 > has been movement and moderation by many Arab nations. If the Ababs had 
 let 
 > the Palestinians into their country and gave them refuge, things may have 
 > been a lot different. They and their military knew how important having 
 > those lands were to defense. They knew it was against international law. 
 So 
 > they let the Palestinains be trapped trapped in a noman's land. 
 > 
 > Sure the Palestinas didn't like it. Nobody likes to be occupied. But they 
 > needed to eat, and survive, so they needed jobs. 
 > Arab nations had jobs, they would not hire or allow Palestinians to work 
 in 
 > their country. Israel did. They gave them jobs, and let them integrate int 
 o 
 > their society to work. The Arab nations began a campaign to stir up and 
 > aggetate, and build resentment and hatred towards Israel. They gave 
 weapons 
 > and explosives. And while the Arabs banded like brothers in their hate and 
 > desire to destroy, where was their brotherly treatment of Palestinians? 
 > 
 > Yes the Arabs could nolonger send their armies down the Gaza Strip, the 
 > Golan Heights, the West Bank and other lands since returned to Egypt, 
 after 
 > peace. What more proof does the world need. Egypt came to the peace table, 
 > made peace, and got their land back. But that is not the objective of the 
 > Arab world. They don't want peace with Israel - they want it destroyed. 
 And 
  
 [continued in next message] 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) 

[ list messages | list forums | previous | next | reply ]

search for:

328,040 visits
(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca