From: jpmcw@comcast.net
Bruce Murphy wrote:
> John McWilliams writes:
>
>
>>Charles stated it well. I don't know why you insist on hammering on an
>>elusive definition and a subject that most folks have moved on from.
>
>
> If it was a 'definition that photo enthusiasts use' then there would
> be a significant number of people toting 'SLRs' that had
> interchangebale lenses but were not in fact SLRs. Are you aware of
> this?
I'm not talking about a defintion you- and, at one point, Lionel used,
perhaps one or two others.
What, exactly, would you have me "become" aware of?
> I'm going to keep at this because since the proponents seem to be
> elitist and uncommnicative bastards, this appears to be the only way
> to get things fixed in thhe charters.
>
And if you still don't get your way are you going to flame them even
more? Flood the group? Become more insulting? Or just maybe more
judgemental.- yeah, that's the ticket.....
f
--
John McWilliams
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|