From: jpmcw@comcast.net 
  
 Bruce Murphy wrote: 
  
 > John McWilliams  writes: 
 > 
 > 
 >>Charles stated it well. I don't know why you insist on hammering on an 
 >>elusive definition and a subject that most folks have moved on from. 
 > 
 > 
 > If it was a 'definition that photo enthusiasts use' then there would 
 > be a significant number of people toting 'SLRs' that had 
 > interchangebale lenses but were not in fact SLRs. Are you aware of 
 > this? 
  
 I'm not talking about a defintion you- and, at one point, Lionel used, 
 perhaps one or two others. 
  
 What, exactly, would you have me "become" aware of? 
  
 > I'm going to keep at this because since the proponents seem to be 
 > elitist and uncommnicative bastards, this appears to be the only way 
 > to get things fixed in thhe charters. 
 > 
  
 And if you still don't get your way are you going to flame them even 
 more? Flood the group? Become more insulting? Or just maybe more 
 judgemental.- yeah, that's the ticket..... 
 f 
  
 -- 
 John McWilliams 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)