From: pack-news@rattus.net 
  
 Charles  writes: 
  
 > In article , edward ohare 
 >  wrote: 
 > 
 > > It is the best name.  It didn't match topicality defined by the 
 > > proposed Charter. 
 > 
 > It was the best name. In the formal sense it didn't match but the 
 > problem is that the formal definition does not fit with the definition 
 > that photography enthusiasts actually use. Most would identify an SLR 
 > as using an interchangeable lens. It is not elitist. It is just what we 
 > think an SLR is. In many of our opinions the SLR lens is more important 
 > than the SLR camera body. 
  
 If you welded the lens on the front of an SLR, I very much doubt the 
 enthusiasts would suddenly claim it wasn't a SLR anymore. Don't let 
 the proponent's haze mislead you on this. 
  
 B> 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)