XPost: rec.photo.digital 
 From: jpmcw@comcast.net 
  
 [News.groups added] 
  
 Steve Young wrote: 
 > "Jeremy Nixon"  wrote in message 
 > news:10k2bnfimpdj309@corp.supernews.com... 
 > 
 >>Steve Young  wrote: 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>>The real point is that when issues come to a service provider to act on 
 >>>complaints, which are against a group's charter, they go one place to 
 >>>look for the charter. That's the archive at isc.org. 
 > 
 > 
 >>Most do not do that. 
 > 
 > 
 > I can believe that 
 > 
 > do you think they should? 
 > 
 > Could we get them to go somewhere else? 
 > 
 > My thinking is that everything must be be together 
 > 
  
 Well, that's certainly logical, but apparently not everything works the 
 way it ought, to put it mildly. 
  
 My impression from what Russ said, and Jeremy above, is that some ISP's 
 would act if sent a complaint and excerpts -or the whole document- from 
 a reasonably ratified amendment to a Charter. Of course, others won't, 
 but they won't anyway. 
  
 It's up to those who care about the Charter of rpd to amend it; to work 
 out the wording, the voting, the ratification of votes, and the 
 dissemenation of same periodically to the NG and anywhere else it may be 
 needed. I'd be willing to help here, but I would think a process not too 
 dissimilar to a new Charter makes sense- others? 
  
 I take it there's no practical way to get it attached to the original or 
 "filed" in proximity to it...(?)<--- a question for the reg. vols. 
  
 -- 
  
 John McWilliams 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)