XPost: rec.photo.digital 
 From: bwr607@hotmail.com 
  
 John McWilliams  wrote in 
 news:kOa0d.144848$9d6.56871@attbi_s54: 
  
 > [News.groups added] 
 > 
 > Steve Young wrote: 
 >> "Jeremy Nixon"  wrote in message 
 >> news:10k2bnfimpdj309@corp.supernews.com... 
 >> 
 >>>Steve Young  wrote: 
 >>> 
 >>> 
 >>>>The real point is that when issues come to a service provider to act on 
 >>>>complaints, which are against a group's charter, they go one place to 
 >>>>look for the charter. That's the archive at isc.org. 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>>Most do not do that. 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> I can believe that 
 >> 
 >> do you think they should? 
 >> 
 >> Could we get them to go somewhere else? 
 >> 
 >> My thinking is that everything must be be together 
 >> 
 > 
 > Well, that's certainly logical, but apparently not everything works the 
 > way it ought, to put it mildly. 
 > 
 > My impression from what Russ said, and Jeremy above, is that some ISP's 
 > would act if sent a complaint and excerpts -or the whole document- from 
 > a reasonably ratified amendment to a Charter. Of course, others won't, 
 > but they won't anyway. 
 > 
 > It's up to those who care about the Charter of rpd to amend it; to work 
 > out the wording, the voting, the ratification of votes, and the 
 > dissemenation of same periodically to the NG and anywhere else it may be 
 > needed. I'd be willing to help here, but I would think a process not too 
 > dissimilar to a new Charter makes sense- others? 
 > 
 > I take it there's no practical way to get it attached to the original or 
 > "filed" in proximity to it...(?)<--- a question for the reg. vols. 
 > 
 > -- 
 > 
 > John McWilliams 
 > 
  
 Gents, would you kindly discuss RPD charter amendments in RPD, and not in 
 news.groups? Thanks. 
  
 [Follow-ups set to RPD] 
  
 -- 
 Bill 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)