From: jpmcw@comcast.net 
  
 {group adjusted} 
  
 Rebecca Ore wrote: 
 > In article , 
 >  "Richard Henry"  wrote: 
 > 
 > 
 >>"Woodchuck Bill"  wrote in message 
 >>news:Xns9560E3CFFAFFbswr607h4@130.133.1.4... 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>>Gents, would you kindly discuss RPD charter amendments in RPD, and not in 
 >>>news.groups? Thanks. 
 >> 
 >>I thought that was one of the purposes of news.groups. 
 > 
 > 
 > No. 
  
 I posted that here because I am looking for confimation/experience re 
 the *process* that people here in .news possess. 
  
 If someone would be kind enough to address those questions and remove 
 r.p.d as I have done with this reply, I would appreciate it. 
  
 > My impression from what Russ said, and Jeremy above, is that some ISP's 
 would act if sent a complaint and excerpts -or the whole document- from a 
 reasonably ratified amendment to a Charter. Of course, others won't, but 
 they 
 won't anyway. 
 > 
 > It's up to those who care about the Charter of rpd to amend it; to work out 
 the wording, the voting, the ratification of votes, and the dissemenation of 
 same periodically to the NG and anywhere else it may be needed. I'd be 
 willing 
 to help here, but I 
 would think a process not too dissimilar to a new Charter makes sense- 
 others? 
 > 
 > I take it there's no practical way to get it attached to the original or 
 "filed" in proximity to it...(?)<--- a question for the reg. vols. 
  
  
 -- 
 John McWilliams 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)