XPost: rec.photo.digital 
 From: ronnirubin@sprintmail.com 
  
 edward ohare wrote: 
  
 > Correct.  Attempting to include things not part of what would be 
 > commonly thought of not to be an slr is futile.  People will skip over 
 > the group without reading the Charter.  Trying to exclude things 
 > commonly thought to be slrs is equally futile. 
  
 On the other hand, excluding things which are actually 
 SLRs because they are not commonly thought to be SLRs 
 is equally futile.  IMHO, the current proposal suffers 
 from both of these defects. 
  
 -- 
 This account is subject to a persistent MS Blaster and SWEN attack. 
 I think I've got the problem resolved, but, if you E-mail me 
 and it bounces, a second try might work. 
 However, please reply in newsgroup. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)