From: owner@bugs.debian.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format...
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2025 07:36:30 +0000
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1111464: fixed in binutils 2.45-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1111464,
regarding libsframe-dev has an undeclared file conflict
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1111464: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1111464
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2025 09:35:13 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-25.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
BODY_INCLUDES_CONTROL_AFFECTS,BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,HAS_PACKAGE,SPF_HELO_NONE,
SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 12; hammy, 104; neutral, 22; spammy,
0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--trixie, 0.000-+--H*F:U*helmut,
0.000-+--H*F:D*subdivi.de, 0.000-+--H*RU:sk:helmut@,
0.000-+--H*rp:U*helmut
Return-path:
Received: from isilmar-4.linta.de ([136.243.71.142]:51814)
by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_P
S_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
(Exim 4.96)
(envelope-from )
id 1unwGm-00H7Hk-1b
for submit@bugs.debian.org;
Mon, 18 Aug 2025 09:35:13 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=subdivi.de;
s=k19.isilmar-4; t=1755509711;
bh=MYAkPfYjoigjZZbbsVduiUWlnI6SalZ0DhouIS3buyg=;
h=Date:From:To:Subject:From;
b=DyVzDZqCH0ZX5gTvBEgFBrGDEtJA9pLjSEaMbD/uMf5wx0udKNIk5wwIF0mB/3Bv/
9H+iFDKOK2S5duPfojqP1iAI2ZYT35ESgNBlvu1FX5lE/71SGLs1eoj79/x2EsKceF
+nhvrwgGriA0omLW7hwdJC0LrfvQHtkBxfxX5WoSD7IzSbGoNnsciFpEcChy2cUfF+
sz0eB+IKGlaKjms1njaywJgNyEPjQZqkPji81W7HzmnK4n/sUiJuaD9Tmko2c9X36Q
YMZVkn/QY1BOYT0rKC3VHSWqhQhjGItbmJX/77oYESgiMsjeX/yhiiIcla6TNMMD5y
sk6vSGyxy9C6Q==
Received: from isilmar-4.linta.de (isilmar.linta [10.0.0.1])
by isilmar-4.linta.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26655200285
for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 09:35:11 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 11:30:01 +0200
From: Helmut Grohne
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: libsframe-dev has an undeclared file conflict
Message-ID: <20250818093001.GA3648015@subdivi.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: libsframe-dev
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
Control: affects -1 + binutils-dev
libsframe-dev has an undeclared file conflict. This may result in an
unpack error from dpkg.
The files
* /usr/include/sframe-api.h
* /usr/include/sframe.h
are contained in the packages
* binutils-dev/2.44-3 as present in trixie
* libsframe-dev/2.45-4 as present in unstable
These packages can be unpacked concurrently, because there is no
relevant Replaces or Conflicts relation. Attempting to unpack these
packages concurrently results in an unpack error from dpkg, because none
of the packages installs a diversion for the affected files.
Kind regards
Helmut
Received: (at 1111464-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2025 07:36:32 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-112.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
MD5_SHA1_SUM,PGPSIGNATURE,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED,
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED,RDNS_NONE,
SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST autolearn=ham
autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 85; hammy, 150; neutral, 99; spammy,
0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--HX-Debian:DAK,
0.000-+--H*rp:D*ftp-master.debian.org, 0.000-+--HX-DAK:process-upload,
0.000-+--UD:debian.tar.xz, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:fasolo.
Return-path:
Received: from muffat.debian.org ([2607:f8f0:614:1::1274:33]:59788)
by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RS
_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
(Exim 4.96)
(envelope-from )
id 1urXBQ-00AGLB-2V
for 1111464-close@bugs.debian.org;
Thu, 28 Aug 2025 07:36:32 +0000
Received: from [192.91.235.231] (port=49472 helo=fasolo.debian.org)
from C=NA,ST=NA,L=Ankh Morpork,O=Debian SMTP,OU=Debian SMTP CA,
N=fasolo.debian.org,EMAIL=hostmaster@fasolo.debian.org (verified)
by muffat.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_P
S_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
(Exim 4.94.2)
(envelope-from )
id 1urXBP-002oVT-Ou
for 1111464-close@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2025 07:36:32 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=ftp-master.debian.org; s=smtpauto.fasolo; h=Date:Message-Id:Content-Type:
Subject:MIME-Version:To:Reply-To:From:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-
ID
:Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
bh=Y3EUUKI90x3OZPOs2FOfzQwgcmSHpnUNjdH+G973MMQ=; b
=CCFt2BO28lbxHzkmK5N2BrlceN
mPPklq6ZyHKv4dbvK25NYFWce5LS3h4r1ni8I2fH08AYcdIQhL
1jzZDHixCfsUCZ2IyDN7gYyjVz0
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|