[continued from previous message] 
  
 >>>>> pointing to its uneven execution. 
 >>>>> ([Wikipedia][3]) 
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> * **Fan Commentary Reflects Division** 
 >>>>> Fans are torn: some find it a creepy and memorable horror outing, 
 >>>>> while others criticize the dream sequences and lack of narrative 
 >>>>> finesse. 
 >>>>> ([Jammer's Reviews][4], [IMDb][6], [Late to the Game Blog][5]) 
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> --- 
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> ## Final Rating: **7 / 10** 
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> **Verdict:** *Night Terrors* is a bold, atmospheric experiment for 
 >>>>> *TNG*, doubling down on sleeper horror within a Star Trek context. Its 
 >>>>> strengths lie in unsettling visuals and psychological drea 
 €€€€€€€€uncommon 
 >>>>> for the series. However, the undercooked dream imagery and narrative 
 >>>>> thinness dilute its effectiveness. At its best, it's a creepy 
 >>>>> standout; at its weakest, it€€€€€€€€s a drawn-out oddity. 
 >>>>> 
 >>>> 
 >>>> Interesting, using a llm to review a 30+ year old episode, an era where 
 >>>> shows weren't serialized like they are today. 
 >>>> 
 >>>> how do you develop lore for a 40 minute episode? 
 >>>> 
 >>>> 
 >>> 
 >>> See €€€Datalore€€€ 
 >> 
 >> What about it? 
 >> 
 > 
 > They developed lore in a 46 minute episode 
  
 Ok 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)