
| Msg # 15 of 1759 on ZZCA4349, Thursday 9-10-25, 1:08 |
| From: THE TRUE MELISSA |
| To: ALL |
| Subj: Re: AI/LLM reviews of STNG - Darmok |
XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.startrek.current, rec.arts.startrek.fandom XPost: rec.arts.startrek.misc, rec.arts.sf.tv From: thetruemelissa@gmail.com Verily, in article <109p3fg$uie2$6@dont-email.me>, did weberm@polaris.net deliver unto us this message: > > thetruemelissa@gmail.com wrote: > > anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote: > > >> You couldn?t possibly develop a language like that naturally. You'd have > >> to start with a real language and then change it just to be annoying. > > > >I'm not so sure about "couldn't possibly." They would need to learn the > >stories somehow, but (according to the fan wiki) the official position > >is that they *mostly* speak in metaphor. Children presumably learn some > >basics in plainer language, which really should have been tried with > >Picard, but a highly metaphorical species might not have thought of it. > > It's been discussed before (and better), but you cannot have a language > that is _entirely_ memes. That's probably why the "mostly" part is in there. -- Trustworthy words are not pretty; Pretty words are not trustworthy. -Lao-Tzu spoke those pretty words. --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
328,136 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca