On Thursday, 28 January 2016 12:26:39 UTC-5, Mr. Mike  wrote:   
   > On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 07:47:30 -0800 (PST), dmunz    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   > >Given that it didn't actually hit the cat, not harm, no foul.  I don't   
   think there is a cat union that would lobby for hazard duty pay or a stunt   
   double in these scenarios...   
   >   
   > These days, it was probably a CGI apple.   
   >   
   > ==============================   
   > My (very old) XF page: http://www.mjq.net/xfiles   
      
   It was a real apple. She hit GA with it twice, in fact.   
      
   https://twitter.com/GillianA/status/692392338635759618   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)