On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 07:47:30 -0800 (PST), dmunz    
   wrote:   
      
   >Given that it didn't actually hit the cat, not harm, no foul.  I don't think   
   there is a cat union that would lobby for hazard duty pay or a stunt double in   
   these scenarios...   
      
   These days, it was probably a CGI apple.   
      
   ==============================   
   My (very old) XF page: http://www.mjq.net/xfiles   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)