On 08-18-13, mark lewis said the following...   
       
    ml>  rw> Yes, it is.   
    ml>    
    ml> i thought it was... and seeing the mystic tearline, i knew that you   
    ml> probably had set everything to default to using the nicknames and hadn't   
    ml> yet gotten around to adjusting the fidonet echos to use real names ;)   
      
   Heh, yeah, slowly but surely making those customizations as time permits :)   
      
    ml>  ml> and here i thought your bbs was Buffalo Online as inducated in the   
    ml>  ml> nodelist for that FTN address ;)   
    ml>    
    ml> AFAIK, the NC generally makes updates to the segments when they are   
    ml> requested to update them by the sysop the entry if for... in this case,   
    ml> i would say that you have two requests to send out... one to each NC   
    ml> with the changes for your entry in their segment...   
      
   Heh, I will have to bring that to his attention then :)   
      
    ml> FWIW: you might also have helped them to find a bug in the processing if   
    ml> their segment updates aren't making it all the way up the line... i know   
    ml> i've helped a few others working where problems were in the flow from   
    ml> the NC thru the RC and up to the ZC...   
      
   Me?  Find bugs?  NEVER!  Perish the thought! :)   
      
   --- Mystic BBS-W4/v1.10 A37 (Linux/64)   
    * Origin: RiverNet BBS * Memphis TN * bbs.rivernet.us (1:116/18)