Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    WINPOINT    |    Support for the WinPoint software    |    1,004 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 785 of 1,004    |
|    Wilfred van Velzen to Tim Schattkowsky    |
|    Re^2: Problem ipv6 vs ipv4    |
|    24 Jun 22 08:33:42    |
      TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815       RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes       TZUTC: 0200       CHRS: UTF-8 2       PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221       MSGID: 2:280/464 62b5695c       REPLY: 2:240/1120.29 8cefcf84       Hi Tim,              On 2022-06-21 19:24:31, you wrote to Ulrich Schroeter:               US>> ,5555,Nieuw_Schnoord,Driebergen,Michiel_van_der_Vlist,-Unpublished-,3        US>> 00,M N,CM,MO,XW,IBN:fido.vlist.eu,IBN:fido4to6.vlis        US>> t.eu,PING,TRACE,U,ENC,RPK,NPK,NC               US>> and here you can find the related FQDNs        US>> I would give it a try with these 2 listed FQDNs               TS> Oh. So is this whole IPv4/IPv6 discussion here about the idea that WP        TS> should try the other entry from the nodelist?              No that's another matter.              What WP should do is if a hostname resolves to multiple IP's (IPv6 or IPv4),       try them all in the order the OS presents them, until one succeeds.              Bye, Wilfred.              --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815        * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)       SEEN-BY: 15/0 106/201 124/5016 129/331 153/757 7715 203/0 221/0 229/110       SEEN-BY: 229/111 112 113 317 426 428 470 664 700 266/512 280/464 5003       SEEN-BY: 280/5555 282/1038 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219       SEEN-BY: 341/234 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 2452/250       PATH: 280/464 712/848 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca