MSGID: 2:240/1120.29 8cefcf84   
   CHRS: IBMPC 2   
   TZUTC: 0200   
   REPLY: 2:240/1120@fidonet 62ac5b73   
   //Hello Ulrich,//   
      
   on *17.06.22* at *10:45:41* You wrote in Area *WINPOINT*   
   to *Tim Schattkowsky* about *"Re: Problem ipv6 vs ipv4"*.   
      
    US> ,5555,Nieuw_Schnoord,Driebergen,Michiel_van_der_Vlist,-Unpublished-,300,M   
    US> N,CM,MO,XW,IBN:fido.vlist.eu,IBN:fido4to6.vlis   
    US> t.eu,PING,TRACE,U,ENC,RPK,NPK,NC   
      
    US> and here you can find the related FQDNs   
    US> I would give it a try with these 2 listed FQDNs   
      
   Oh. So is this whole IPv4/IPv6 discussion here about the idea that WP should   
   try the other entry from the nodelist?    
      
   Regards,   
   Tim   
      
   --- WinPoint 408.3   
    * Origin: Original WinPoint Origin! (2:240/1120.29)   
   SEEN-BY: 15/0 106/201 124/5016 129/331 153/757 7715 203/0 221/0 1   
   SEEN-BY: 221/6 229/110 111 112 113 317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120   
   SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 291/111 292/854 8125 301/1   
   SEEN-BY: 301/113 310/31 317/3 320/219 335/364 341/66 234 371/0 396/45   
   SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 2452/250 3634/12 5020/1042 5058/104   
   PATH: 240/1120 301/1 280/464 712/848 229/426