home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   WINPOINT      Support for the WinPoint software      1,004 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 665 of 1,004   
   Tim Schattkowsky to Michiel van der Vlist   
   Re: WinPoint Version 404 IPV5   
   09 Mar 22 17:47:28   
   
   MSGID: 2:240/1120.29 45b0bf06   
   CHRS: CP850 2   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   REPLY: 2:280/5555 62289ce3   
   //Hello Michiel,//   
      
   on *09.03.22* at *12:26:10* You wrote in Area *WINPOINT*   
   to *Tim Schattkowsky* about *"WinPoint Version 404 IPV5"*.   
      
    TS>> Admittedly, when it comes to IPv6, I still live maybe even more than a   
    TS>> decade ago, when that was a good idea. Had other things to do in   
    TS>> between. But I agree, that the practice is now different, particularly   
    TS>> since nowadays the OS actually takes better care about the Ipv6   
    TS>> connection state.   
      
    MvdV> Ten years ago things were different indeed. While IPv6 was introduced   
    MvdV> over 20 years ago, ten years ago implemenentations were still more or   
    MvdV> less in the infant fase and ever so often IPv6 connections would fail   
    MvdV> for one reason or another. Mostly because systems advertised IPv6   
    MvdV> connectivity but in fact did not. Nowadays that is rare. And now with   
    MvdV> DS-Lite connections, IPv4 is the inferior protocol, so IPv6 should be   
    MvdV> the preferred connection whenever possible.   
      
   Fully agree. However, since still the clients connects to the host, the debate   
   becomes pointless for DS-Lite as in that case the host should only present an   
   IPv6 address. So there is nothing to choose here anyway.    
      
   On the other hand, I still cannot see any drawbacks of using IPv4 to connect a   
   host that supports both IPv4 and IPv6. To put it differently: there is no   
   actual advantage in using IPv6 (other than feeling cool), so whats wrong with   
   using IPv4 that may actually still have compatibility. Once the connection is   
   established its all the same anyway.   
      
   Regards,   
   Tim   
      
   --- WinPoint 404.0   
    * Origin: Original WinPoint Origin! (2:240/1120.29)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/120 15/0 18/0 106/201 123/0 129/331 138/146 153/7715 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 229/110 317 426 428 664 700 240/1120 250/1 266/512 275/100   
   SEEN-BY: 275/1000 282/1038 291/111 292/854 301/1 317/3 320/219 335/364   
   SEEN-BY: 342/11 371/0 396/45 460/58 640/1321 712/848 2452/250 3634/0   
   SEEN-BY: 3634/12   
   PATH: 240/1120 3634/12 153/7715 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca