home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   WINPOINT      Support for the WinPoint software      1,004 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 641 of 1,004   
   Tim Schattkowsky to Martin Foster   
   Re: WinPoint Version 402.1   
   07 Mar 22 16:29:31   
   
   MSGID: 2:240/1120.29 4456cb85   
   CHRS: IBMPC 2   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   REPLY: 2:280/464.27 442f5709   
   //Hello Martin,//   
      
   on *07.03.2022* at *11:46:42* You wrote in Area *WINPOINT*   
   to *August Abolins* about *"WinPoint Version 402.1"*.   
      
    MF> Hello August!   
      
    MF> *** Sunday 06.03.22 at 13:10:00, August Abolins wrote to Martin Foster:   
      
    MF>>> However, I've discovered that messages written by me using WinPoint   
    MF>>> ARE, in fact, italicised in the message list, whereas messages written   
    MF>>> by me using OpenXP are NOT italicised in the message list. I'm now left   
    MF>>> wondering if this is by design or whether it's a bug ??   
      
    AA>> Interesting. Winpoint seems to deviate from the formatting   
    AA>> "codes".  Instead of a single / around a word to italicise it,   
    AA>> it uses two /'s.   
      
    MF> Hmmmm, well, there must be a valid reason for that but what, I really   
    MF> don't know.   
      
    AA>> With two /'s, the italics fails in OpenXP as well as in Thunderbird.   
      
    MF> I can't really comment about Thunderbird but AFAIK, OpenXP doesn't   
    MF> support italic text.   
      
   As a matter of fact, I do not recall anymore why it is like that ... but it   
   has been for 20 years now without complaint. That may be related to the fact,   
   that italics have been rarely used in the past as text displays had no   
   appropriate way to render them. Still today, italics rendering for monospaced   
   fonts has quality issues (as can be seen in WP). I can only recall, that for   
   example Spot on the Amiga (which I used before moving to OS/2 and before   
   writing WP) was indeed using a single slash, but nobody used it.     
      
   I can only speculate, that back in the days I was aware and of the single   
   slash practice and had whatever reason to deviate from it. Today my first   
   reflex would be indeed to say, the single slash makes more sense.   
      
   However, interestingly I NEVER noticed anyone using the /single/ slash in a   
   message as that would stand out in WPs display. I do see WP users using the   
   WP-style from time to time, but of course I am to blame for that.    
      
   Regards,   
   Tim   
      
   --- WinPoint 404.0   
    * Origin: Original WinPoint Origin! (2:240/1120.29)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/120 15/0 18/0 106/201 123/0 129/331 138/146 153/7715 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 229/110 317 426 428 664 700 240/1120 250/1 266/512 275/100   
   SEEN-BY: 275/1000 282/1038 291/111 292/854 301/1 317/3 320/219 335/364   
   SEEN-BY: 342/11 371/0 396/45 460/58 640/1321 712/848 2452/250 3634/0   
   SEEN-BY: 3634/12   
   PATH: 240/1120 3634/12 153/7715 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca