MSGID: 2:240/1120.29 3affbc07   
   CHRS: IBMPC 2   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   REPLY: 2:341/234 621926ba   
   //Hello Carlos,//   
      
   on *25.02.22* at *18:31:48* You wrote in Area *WINPOINT*   
   to *Tim Schattkowsky* about *"IBMPC vs CP437"*.   
      
    CN> FTS-5003 considers IBMPC obsolete (see sections 4 and 5).    
      
   Correct.   
      
    CN> If I'm not mistaken most modern FTN software uses CP437 instead.   
      
   Since there exists software that only works with IBMPC and all software using   
   CP437 is probably supporting IBMPC is well, it makes most sense to write IBMPC   
   to the kludge to maximize compatibility. Why would anyone want to move to a   
   less compatible alternative to feel better about standards that are intended   
   to describe the current technical practice?   
      
   For the fun of it: What would be the benefit of writing CP437 instead of IBMPC?   
      
   Regards,   
   Tim   
      
   --- WinPoint 400.3   
    * Origin: Original WinPoint Origin! (2:240/1120.29)   
   SEEN-BY: 15/0 92/1 106/201 129/331 153/7715 218/700 221/1 6 229/110   
   SEEN-BY: 229/317 426 428 664 700 240/1120 266/512 280/464 282/1038   
   SEEN-BY: 292/854 301/1 113 317/3 320/219 335/364 341/66 371/0 396/45   
   SEEN-BY: 460/58 712/848 2452/250 3634/12 5020/1042 5058/104   
   PATH: 240/1120 301/1 229/426