home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   WINDOWS      Bill Gates farts and we can ALL smell it      3,071 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,022 of 3,071   
   Paul Quinn to Bob Klahn   
   Virtual Machine   
   28 Apr 13 11:25:00   
   
    + CrossPosted in: WIN95   
    + CrossPosted in: WINDOWS   
      
   Hi! Bob,   
      
   In a message to All you wrote:   
      
    BK> Has anyone here used Win 95 or Win 98 or ME in a virtual machine?   
      
   Why run Win95 when you can do Win98?!?  :)   
      
   I favour using VirtualBox (vBox) here.  They use _both_ RAM (when running) &   
   HDD space (dynamically expandable [not always using the defined space]), as   
   configured in their setup definitions.   
      
   I run two Win98SE vBox PCs 24/7.  *This* vBox, which is my primary Fidonet   
   node, uses 128Mb RAM and has a pair of 2Gb drives.  The other Win98SE vBox PC,   
   which runs POP3/SMTP/HTTP servers for our LAN, also uses 128Mb RAM but has a   
   pair of 4Gb HDDS defined.   
      
   There are also a couple of Linux vBox Fidonet nodes running, each using 256Mb   
   RAM.  One is a 24/7 system with a 2Gb HDD and the other is a part-time   
   (limited hours) system with a 10Gb HDD.  Both are used for testing various   
   Fido & networking functions.   
      
   I also have another 24/7 Linux vBox system, using 512Mb RAM and a 40Gb & 80Gb   
   pair of drives, that provides a print-to-PDF *printer* and various LAN-shared   
   pseudo drives.  It was originally my main personal PC years ago, and used to   
   run vBox and a thing called the VMware player in its own right.   
      
   So, generally there are five vBox PCs running much of the time: 2x 128Mb RAM;   
   2x 256Mb RAM and the single 512Mb RAM system.  That's ermm... roughly 1.3Gb   
   RAM.  Still plenty available from the 4Gb RAM that this Ubuntu (U'u) 10.04   
   host has.   
      
   There are also other configured vBox PCs that run at various times, but only   
   for limited periods.  E.g. a XP SP1 vBox (games PC and some tools for ad-hoc   
   work on my main Fidonet node) and another U'u 12.04.1 vBox, and, another   
   'generic' linux vBox used for running occasional testing of downloaded .iso   
   file from other Linux distributions.   
      
   My wife's U'u 10.04 2Gb RAM PC runs XP SP2 24/7.  She wanted Windows, so   
   that's all she sees: XP.  To her, the PC runs XP.   
      
    BK> I am wondering, is the virtual machine on the HD, or in ram? How   
    BK> large is it?   
      
   It varies per each configured vBox/VM, however-which-way pleases you.   
      
    BK> I was just thinking of adding ram to an old laptop, and got to   
    BK> thinking about linux distros that run in ram. I was wondering   
    BK> about running Win 98 in ram, and if it would run much faster.   
      
   For running Win98 you just need to have plenty of HDD space.  It runs fine in   
   just 128Mb, in a vBox.  (I'm not sure about a laptop, though.)   
      
   Hope it helps you.   
      
   Cheers,   
   Paul.   
      
   ... A fight to the death with a zombie has a few inherent problems.   
   --- Paul's Win98SE VirtualBox   
    * Origin: Quinn's Post - Maryborough, Queensland, OZ (3:640/384)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca