Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    WIN95    |    Chat about Windows 95, 98, ME systems    |    13,597 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 13,112 of 13,597    |
|    WKITTY42 to PSI-JACK    |
|    Re: NetMail specific opti    |
|    31 Jan 19 19:20:24    |
      On 09/07/14, Psi-Jack said the following...                Ps> In there has Netmail Crash, Netmail Hold, and Netmail Killsent. Now, I        Ps> agree with only 2 of these being there, Netmail Hold, and Netmail        Ps> Killsent. but Crash, should NEVER be globally enabled because it's not        Ps> likely to be able to get to its destination unless Mystic itself is able        Ps> to directly, and securely establish a connection to the destination node        Ps> it's intended for.              i allow some of my users to crash netmails to remote systems... yes, even       systems that i do not have a secure password with... the crash option is a       sysop selectable choice and i see no problems with it... if users can choose       it is another option that the sysop can decide on...               Ps> Netmail flags like this would actually be better in actual message editor        Ps> options to be able to set certain features. In fact, just an example        Ps> that Janis provided me with for BBBS, which Mystic could still do better        Ps> with the editor menu options more dynamically:              let's not forget that BBBS is a completely different animal... keep reading...               Ps> In BBBS's example though, when setting the subject, one could use various        Ps> subject lines, the first character (or first few characters, I guess        Ps> depending on if it supports multiple flags or not), would be something        Ps> like:              BBBS is the /only/ system that i'm aware of that allows choices like this via       the subject line... pretty much every other system uses the normal message       status bits and the operator's choice if users can set these bits or not...               Ps> This could be done in Mystic's Menu to set Crash, or if you set crash        Ps> and then set hold, remove crash and set hold. Attach of course would let        Ps> you upload a file that would be attached to the specific message. I        Ps> don't recall what file request would be used for though.              crash/hold has a specific meaning in the BSO world... it is how the old style       binkleyterm compatible software handles the DIRect message status bit...              the filre request bit is set when a FREQ is created... the subject line       contains the name of the file being requested as well as an possible password       necessary to access the file... one file may be requested per message... if       multiple files are being requested in one session, then the system should       create multiple netmails with the FREQ bit set and the name of the file in the       subject line with the password if needed...               Ps> This, on a per-message basis, with ACS restrictions to be able to set        Ps> attach, crash, hold, and possibly file request messages, all        Ps> specifically and only on any Message Base where type is NetMail. There        Ps> was one missing one I think from Janis's example, which is Direct, which        Ps> Crash itself simply means, Direct AND Now, rather than just Direct when        Ps> the system does it's normal polls.              ummm, no... CRAsh means when the events allow... IMMediate means now regardless       of the event settings... there's also routing to deal with... DIRect overrides       routing... but then BSO has some limitations and these are right up in the       midst of those limitations...               Ps> Anyway, I hope to see something like this fixed, because the global        Ps> option for Netmail Crash is generally a horrendously bad idea. :)              really? if the sysop has no problems with the netmail going out right now if       the current event allows for it?              oh wait... mystic doesn't (yet??) allow for mailer events which qualify mail       to be sent or not...              )              --- Mystic BBS v1.10 A51 (Windows)        * Origin: (46:1/132)        þ Synchronet þ thePharcyde_ >> telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca