SD> SCSI is quite easy under OS/2 as I'm sure you know. Windows, not so much.   
      
   I used to use SCSI with OS/2 Warp 3.0 in the old days.  Even was using several   
   of the HP DAT tape drives (with auto-loaders) via SCSI back then.   
      
   SD> I'm running all SATA currently except in the old BBS machine. I'm   
   SD> thinking about repurposing it for a syslog server. The motherboard is a   
   SD> 20+-year-old SuperMicro setup and it's very very reliable. I figured if I   
   SD> slap a 120GB hard drive in it, that should be enough for a syslog server.   
   SD> :)   
   SD> Now I'm starting to wander off into non-Windows territory (does Windows   
   SD> support a syslog server?)...   
      
   Depends on what you are pointing to the syslog server.  One of my work   
   firewalls set to informational - if pointed to the syslog server was using   
   5-6GB per day.     
      
   Windows can run syslog servers with no issues.  If I remember correctly, we   
   are using Kiwi for some syslogs and Solarwinds for others.   
      
   - Mark   
      
   --- WWIVToss v.1.51    
    * Origin:  http://www.weather-station.org * Bel Air, MD -USA (1:261/1304.0)