Hi, Mark-   
      
   MH> SCSI was my favorite years ago.  Those drives are the best for random    
   MH> seeking of data - which makes them perfect for servers.  I used them in my    
      
   MH> main server many years ago, which used to house the BBS data.   
      
   SCSI is quite easy under OS/2 as I'm sure you know.  Windows, not so much.   
      
   MH> I'm all SATA these days, except for my DL360 G6 server internal drives    
   MH> which are SAS.   
      
   I'm running all SATA currently except in the old BBS machine.  I'm thinking   
   about repurposing it for a syslog server.  The motherboard is a 20+-year-old   
   SuperMicro setup and it's very very reliable.  I figured if I slap a 120GB   
   hard drive in it, that should be enough for a syslog server. :)   
      
   Now I'm starting to wander off into non-Windows territory (does Windows   
   support a syslog server?)...   
      
   --Sean   
      
      
      
      
   --- MBSE BBS v1.0.5.1 (GNU/Linux-i386)   
    * Origin: Outpost BBS * Johnson City, TN, USA (1:18/200)