Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    WIN95    |    Chat about Windows 95, 98, ME systems    |    13,597 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,004 of 13,597    |
|    Ed Vance to Alan Zisman    |
|    Windows 8 tiles look like    |
|    28 Jul 14 09:35:00    |
      07-26-14 11:44 Alan Zisman wrote to TOM WALKER about Windows 8 tiles look like               AZ> @MSGID: <53D44CCB.13089.windowsa@capcity2.synchro.net>        AZ> @REPLY: <53D44CCB.13083.windowsa@capcity2.synchro.net>        AZ> On 2014-07-26, 4:40 AM, TOM WALKER -> ERIC OULASHIN wrote:        EO>> Just for humor - Windows 8's tiled interface looks very similar to        TW> Windows 1        EO>> (1985):        EO>> http://bit.ly/WNzMU0               TW> I never saw Windows 1.0 but understand it was one of the biggest        TW> disasters in Computer History.        TW> ---        AZ> Not necessarily a disaster - a necessary piece in an evolution        AZ> of PC hardware and software.               AZ> I ran it for a while on a 26 lb 'luggable' portable PC with 512        AZ> kb RAM, two 5 1/4" floppy disk drives, and a 20 MB hard drive.        AZ> 8" green on black CRT screen.               AZ> It was forced by the hardware of the day (remember, it was        AZ> released in Nov 1985 - significantly late) to be able to run on        AZ> a system with 256 kb of memory and two floppy disk drives - no        AZ> hard drive. On that minimal system, performance was (no        AZ> surprise!) poor... non-graphical multitasking systems offered        AZ> better performance, but Windows 1.0 showed the possibilities of        AZ> bit-mapped screens and multitasking on PC hardware.               AZ> (It also showed that Microsoft had no sense of graphical        AZ> design, and was prone to release software late).              Howdy! Alan,              I thought Microsoft was prone to release OS software too Early.              Didn't they give the Windows 95 OS a Name and felt rushed to get it out       the door before the end of 1995?       As in the August 1995 Release of Windows 95 when it wasn't really ready       yet for use on any computers because they knew it was gonna need       Updates to sections of the OS.              My Opinion.              ... Remember, 'i' before 'e' except in words where it isn't.       --- MultiMail/MS-DOS v0.49       --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux        * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca