|    WHO    |    The Int'l Doctor Who and British SF TV C    |    6,584 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 6,212 of 6,584    |
|    bored to All    |
|    Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Sp    |
|    02 Oct 12 18:49:06    |
   
   From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho.moderated   
   From Address: bored@now.com   
   Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers   
      
   In article , andyl@azaal.plus.com    
   says...   
   >    
   > I think some of the sameyness is due to the format of production.   
      
   I'm sure you're right. But that isn't necessarily a bad thing I don't    
   think.    
      
   > The show-runner aspect necessarily leads to some homogeneity.   
   > The alternative (as in the original series) of producer / script >   
   editor /   
   > multiple writers often seemed to provide more creative tension.   
      
   Watering a vision down is seldom a good idea but giving the writer more    
   of a break somehow may be a way forward. The problem I suspect would be    
   finding writers capable of writing what is a difficult genre to get    
   right. I expect TV companies don't understand how much work is involved   
   when a writer is sitting motionless staring into space.    
      
   Whatever - we've all been treated to a remarkably consistantly well   
   produced series for a number of years now. I don't think I've seen that    
   anywhere other than with US imports.    
      
   I think its just worth sounding an alarm bell now and again though.   
   Over-hyping is a dangerous activity...   
       
   The Progenitor   
   -------------   
      
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    * Origin: virginmedia.com (1:2320/105.97)   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux   
    * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca