From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho.moderated   
   From Address: solar.penguin@gmail.com   
   Subject: Re: jphalt's Doctor Who reviews   
      
   jphalt@aol.com wrote:   
      
   > Well, I don't think we'll be in agreement too often anytime Tom Baker   
   > comes up in my rotation.  I find Tom actively irritating when he tries   
   > too hard to "be funny," and find him far more effective when he's   
   > serious.  I will say that I think Hinchcliffe gets over-venerated   
   > sometimes, to the point where it can feel as though "Hinchcliffe Who"   
   > is immune from criticism - though I think that's actually faded a bit   
   > since the New Series (somewhat surprisingly) DIDN'T use Hinchcliffe as   
   > a template, save for the odd story or two.   
      
   Maybe I was a bit over-harsh in my comments.  It's just I find horror   
   stories so gloomy and depressing and, worse, so stupid which is the   
   worst thing a story can be.  I hate this this time of year, with all   
   the Halloween stuff around, and I over-reacted by venting all my anger   
   on you.  I'm sorry.   
      
   So, in an effort to find something good and positive about   
   "Pyramids"... at least it doesn't have River Song in it!  And despite   
   the horror influence, there are no vampires, which is nice.   
      
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    * Origin: http://groups.google.com (1:2320/105.97)   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux   
    * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)