home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   VATICAN      News direct from the Vatican Information      2,032 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 476 of 2,032   
   Vatican Information Service - Eng - to All   
   2 VISnews 110516   
   16 May 11 08:05:00   
   
     If the accusation is considered credible, it is required that the case =   
   be   
   referred to the CDF. Once the case is studied the CDF will indicate the   
   further steps to be taken. At the same time, the CDF will offer =   
   direction to   
   assure that appropriate measures are taken which both guarantee a just   
   process for the accused priest, respecting his fundamental right of =   
   defence,   
   and care for the good of the Church, including the good of victims. In =   
   this   
   regard, it should be noted that normally the imposition of a permanent   
      
   Subject: VISnews 110516   
   Organization: VIS - Ufficio Stampa della Santa Sede   
   From: Vatican Information Service - Eng - txt    
      
   penalty, such as dismissal from the clerical state, requires a penal   
   judicial process. In accord with canon law (cf. CIC can. 1342) the =   
   Ordinary   
   is not able to decree permanent penalties by extrajudicial decree. The   
   matter must be referred to the CDF which will make the definitive =   
   judgement   
   on the guilt of the cleric and his unsuitability for ministry, as well =   
   as   
   the consequent imposition of a perpetual penalty (SST art. 21, '2).   
      
   The canonical measures applied in dealing with a cleric found guilty of   
   sexual abuse of a minor are generally of two kinds: 1) measures which   
   completely restrict public ministry or at least exclude the cleric from =   
   any   
   contact with minors. These measures can be reinforced with a penal =   
   precept;   
   2) ecclesiastical penalties, among which the most grave is the dismissal   
   from the clerical state.   
      
     In some cases, at the request of the cleric himself, a dispensation =   
   from   
   the obligations of the clerical state, including celibacy, can be given =   
   pro   
   bono Ecclesiae.   
      
     The preliminary investigation, as well as the entire process, ought to =   
   be   
   carried out with due respect for the privacy of the persons involved and =   
   due   
   attention to their reputations.   
      
     Unless there are serious contrary indications, before a case is =   
   referred   
   to the CDF, the accused cleric should be informed of the accusation =   
   which   
   has been made, and given the opportunity to respond to it. The prudence =   
   of   
   the bishop will determine what information will be communicated to the   
   accused in the course of the preliminary investigation.   
      
     It remains the duty of the Bishop or the Major Superior to provide for =   
   the   
   common good by determining what precautionary measures of CIC can. 1722 =   
   and   
   CCEO can. 1473 should be imposed. In accord with SST art. 19, this can =   
   be   
   done once the preliminary investigation has been initiated.   
      
     Finally, it should be noted that, saving the approval of the Holy See,   
   when a Conference of Bishops intends to give specific norms, such =   
   provisions   
   must be understood as a complement to universal law and not replacing =   
   it.   
   The particular provisions must therefore be in harmony with the CIC / =   
   CCEO   
   as well as with the Motu Proprio Sacramentorum sanctitatis tutela (30 =   
   April   
   2001) as updated on 21 May 2010. In the event that a Conference would =   
   decide   
   to establish binding norms it will be necessary to request the =   
   recognitio   
   from the competent Dicasteries of the Roman Curia.   
      
   III.  Suggestions for Ordinaries on Procedures:   
      
     The Guidelines prepared by the Episcopal Conference ought to provide   
   guidance to Diocesan Bishops and Major Superiors in case they are =   
   informed   
   of allegations of sexual abuse of minors by clerics present in the =   
   territory   
   of their jurisdiction. Such Guidelines, moreover, should take account of =   
   the   
   following observations:   
      
   a.)  the notion of 'sexual abuse of minors' should concur with the   
   definition of article 6 of the Motu Proprio SST ('the delict against the   
   sixth commandment of the Decalogue committed by a cleric with a minor =   
   below   
   the age of eighteen years'), as well as with the interpretation and   
   jurisprudence of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, while   
   taking into account the civil law of the respective country;   
      
   b.)  the person who reports the delict ought to be treated with respect. =   
   In   
   the cases where sexual abuse is connected with another delict against =   
   the   
   dignity of the sacrament of Penance (SST art. 4), the one reporting has =   
   the   
   right to request that his or her name not be made known to the priest   
   denounced (SST art. 24);   
      
   c.)  ecclesiastical authority should commit itself to offering spiritual =   
   and   
   psychological assistance to the victims;   
      
   d.)  investigation of accusations is to be done with due respect for the   
   principle of privacy and the good name of the persons involved;   
      
   e.)  unless there are serious contrary indications, even in the course =   
   of   
   the preliminary investigation, the accused cleric should be informed of =   
   the   
   accusation, and given the opportunity to respond to it.   
      
   f.)  consultative bodies of review and discernment concerning individual   
   cases, foreseen in some places, cannot substitute for the discernment =   
   and   
   potestas regiminis of individual bishops;   
      
   g.)  the Guidelines are to make allowance for the legislation of the =   
   country   
   where the Conference is located, in particular regarding what pertains =   
   to   
   the obligation of notifying civil authorities;   
      
   h.)  during the course of the disciplinary or penal process the accused   
   cleric should always be afforded a just and fit sustenance;   
      
   i.)  the return of a cleric to public ministry is excluded if such =   
   ministry   
   is a danger for minors or a cause of scandal for the community.   
      
   Conclusion   
      
   The Guidelines developed by Episcopal Conferences seek to protect minors =   
   and   
   to help victims in finding assistance and reconciliation. They will also   
   indicate that the responsibility for dealing with the delicts of sexual   
   abuse of minors by clerics belongs in the first place to the Diocesan   
   Bishop. Finally, the Guidelines will lead to a common orientation within   
   each Episcopal Conference helping to better harmonize the resources of   
   single Bishops in safeguarding minors."   
   CDF/                                                                    VIS   
   20110516 ()   
      
   NOTE ON THE CIRCULAR LETTER FROM THE CDF   
      
   VATICAN CITY, 16 MAY 2011 (VIS) - Below is the note from the director of =   
   the   
   Holy See Press Office, Fr. Federico Lombardi S.J., regarding the =   
   Circular   
   Letter from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to the =   
   Episcopal   
   Conferences on the Guidelines for dealing with cases of sexual abuse of   
   minors by clerics:   
      
     "The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has asked every =   
   Bishops'   
   Conferences in the world to prepare 'Guidelines' for dealing with cases =   
   of   
   sexual abuse of minors by clergy, in ways appropriate to specific =   
   situations   
   in different regions, by May 2012.   
      
     In its 'Circular Letter', the Congregation has offered a broad set of   
   principles and indications, which will not only facilitate the =   
   formulation   
   of the guidelines and therefore a uniformity of conduct of =   
   ecclesiastical   
   authorities in various nations, but will also ensure consistency at the   
   level of the universal Church, while respecting the competence of =   
   bishops   
   and religious superiors.   
      
     Priority is given to victims, prevention programs, seminary formation =   
   and   
   an ongoing formation of clergy, cooperation with civil authorities, the   
   careful and rigorous implementation of the most canonical recent =   
   legislation   
   in the area are the principal considerations that must structure the   
   Guidelines in every corner of the world.   
      
           * * *   
      
     In recent days, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has =   
   sent to   
   all Episcopal conferences a 'Circular Letter to assist Episcopal =   
   Conferences   
   in developing Guidelines for dealing with cases of sexual abuse of =   
   minors   
   perpetrated by clerics'.   
      
     The preparation of the document was announced in July, at the time of =   
   the   
   publication of new rules for the implementation of the Motu Proprio "   
   Sacramentorum sanctitatis tutela " (see Note Fr. F. Lombardi, in OR,   
   16/07/2010, 1, and www.vatican.va, Abuse of minors. The Church's =   
   response).   
      
     H.E., Cardinal Levada, Prefect of the Congregation, later informed of =   
   its   
   preparation during the meeting of the Cardinals at the November =   
   Consistory   
   (see Press Release on the Afternoon Session, 11/19/2010).   
      
     The document is accompanied by a letter of presentation, signed by   
   Cardinal Levada, illustrating its nature and purpose.   
      
     Following the revision of norms on sexual abuse of minors by members =   
   of   
   the clergy, approved by the Pope last year, 'it seems opportune that =   
   each   
   Episcopal Conference prepare Guidelines' whose purpose will be to assist =   
   the   
   Bishops of the Conference to follow clear and coordinated procedures in   
   dealing with these instances of abuse. Such Guidelines would take into   
   account the concrete situation of the jurisdictions within the Episcopal   
   Conference.   
      
     To this end, the Circular Letter 'contains general themes' for   
   consideration which naturally must be adapted to national realities, but   
   which will help to ensure a coordinated approach by the various =   
   episcopates   
   as well as - precisely thanks to the Guidelines - within the Episcopal   
   Conferences.   
      
     Regarding the drafting of new Guidelines or the revision of existing =   
   ones,   
   Cardinal Levada's letter also gives two indications: first, to involve =   
   the   
   Major Superiors of clerical religious Institutes (to take into account =   
   not   
   only diocesan clergy, but also religious), and then to send a copy of =   
   the   
   completed Guidelines to the Congregation by the end of May 2012.   
      
     In conclusion, two concerns are clear:=20   
      
   1.  The need to address the problem promptly and effectively with clear,   
   organic, indications that are suitable to local situations and in =   
   relation   
   to the norms and civil authorities. The indication of a specific date =   
   and a   
   relatively short period within which all Episcopal conferences must =   
   develop   
   Guidelines is clearly a very strong and eloquent statement.   
      
   2.  Respect for the fundamental competence of the diocesan bishops (and   
   Major Superiors) in the matter (the wording of the Circular is very keen =   
   to   
   stress this aspect: the guidelines are intended to 'assist the diocesan   
   bishops and Major Superiors').=20   
      
   The Circular Letter itself is short but very dense, and is divided into   
   three parts.=20   
      
     The first part develops a set of general considerations, including in   
   particular:   
      
     Priority attention to the victims of sexual abuse: listening to the   
   victims and their families, and a commitment to their spiritual and   
   psychological assistance.   
      
     The development of prevention programs to create truly safe =   
   environments   
   for children.   
      
     The formation of future priests and religious and exchange of =   
   information   
   on candidates to the priesthood or religious life who are transferred.   
      
     Support for priests, their ongoing formation and informing them of =   
   their   
   responsibilities regarding the issue, how to support them when they are   
   accused, dealing with cases of abuse according to law, the =   
   rehabilitation of   
   the good reputation of those who have been unjustly accused.   
      
     Cooperation with civil authorities within their responsibilities.   
   'Specifically, without prejudice to the sacramental internal forum, the   
   prescriptions of civil law regarding the reporting of such crimes to the   
   designated authority should always be followed'. This cooperation should =   
   be   
   implemented not only in cases of abuse by clergy, but by any employee =   
   who   
   works in a Church structure.   
      
     The second part addresses applicable canonical legislation in force =   
   today,   
   after the revision of 2010.   
      
     It refers to the power of bishops and Major Superiors in preliminary   
   investigation and, in the case of a credible allegation, their =   
   obligation to   
   refer the matter to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, =   
   which   
   offers guidance for the handling of the case.   
      
     It speaks about the precautionary measures to be imposed and =   
   information   
   to be given to the accused during the preliminary investigation.   
      
     It refers to the canonical measures and ecclesiastical penalties that =   
   can   
   be applied to offenders, including dismissal from the clerical state.   
      
     Finally, it specifies the relationship between canon law valid for the   
   entire Church and any additional specific particular norms that given   
   Episcopal Conferences deem appropriate or necessary, and the procedure =   
   to be   
   followed in such cases.   
      
     The Third and final part lists a number of useful observations in   
   formulating concrete operational guidelines for bishops and major =   
   superiors.   
      
     Among other things, the need to offer assistance to victims is =   
   stressed as   
   well as the need to treat the complainant with respect and ensure the   
   privacy and reputation of the people involved; to take due account of =   
   the   
   civil laws of the country, including any obligation to notify the civil   
   authorities; to ensure the accused information on the allegation and an   
   opportunity to respond, and in any case a just and worthy support; to   
   exclude the cleric's return to public ministry, in case of danger to =   
   minors   
   or of scandal to the community. Once again, the primary responsibility =   
   of   
   bishops and Major Superiors is reiterated, a responsibility which can =   
   not be   
   replaced by supervisory bodies, however useful or necessary they may be =   
   in   
   support of this responsibility.=20   
      
     The Circular therefore represents a very important new step in =   
   promoting   
   awareness throughout the Church of the need and urgency to effectively   
   respond to the scourge of sexual abuse by members of the clergy. Only in   
   this way can we renew full credibility in the witness and educational   
   mission of the Church, and help create in society in general, safe   
   educational environments of which there is an urgent need."   
   OP/                                                             VIS 20110516   
   (1170)   
      
   AUDIENCES   
      
   VATICAN CITY, 16 MAY 2011 (VIS) - On Saturday the Holy Father received =   
   in   
   separate audiences:   
      
    - Five prelates from the Conference of Catholic Bishops of India on =   
   their   
   "ad limina" visit:   
      
       - Bishop Salvadore Lobo, of Baruipur.   
      
       - Bishop Stephen Lepcha, of Darjeeling.   
      
       - Bishop Clement Tirkey, of Jalpaiguri.   
      
       - Bishop Joseph Suren Gomes, S.D.B., of Krishnagar.   
      
       - Bishop Alphonsus Flavian D'Souza, S.J., of Raiganj.   
      
     Today, the Holy Father received in audience Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco,   
   archbishop of Genoa (Italy), president of the Italian Episcopal =   
   Conference.   
   AL/                                                                     VIS   
   20110516 (70)   
   _____________________________________________   
      
   For further information and research of documents visit:   
    www.visnews.org  and  www.vatican.va=20   
   VIS english (text format) sends its news service only to those who have   
   requested it. If you no longer wish to receive the service, visit the   
   following link and click on calcel. Don't forget to select language and =   
   text   
   format:   
   http://press.catholica.va/news_services/press/vis/englinde.php   
      
   COPYRIGHT: The news items contained in the Vatican Information Service   
   may be used, in part or in their entirety, by quoting the source:   
   V.I.S. -Vatican Information Service   
      
      
      
      
   --- NetMgr/2 1.0y+   
    * Origin: NetMgr+ @ Sursum Corda! BBS Meridian MS USA (1:396/45)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca