REPLY: 2:280/5555 67cefb2e   
   MSGID: 1:154/10 67cf7cdd   
   CHRS: UTF-8 4   
   TZUTC: -0500   
   TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2024-03-02   
   Hey Michiel!   
      
   On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 15:26:06 +0100, you wrote:   
      
    > Then again here in The Neterlands we are used to dealing with accents   
    > and diaresis. They are paty of out language.   
      
   Very true, and it's the complete opposite here. Not only my name, but I've   
   seen plenty of words that should have an accent or diaeresis and is quite   
   often typed without.   
      
    NB>> I'm not saying it's impossible, as I can do ALT-0235 to get the   
    NB>> desired "ë",   
      
    > ALT 137 in DOS.   
    > There is the alternative of "AltGr". The right Alt key acts as a second   
    > "shift" key. E.g. "AltGr 5" is the Euro sign.   
      
   I would have to do some reconfiguration to get that. Both of my alt keys do   
   the same thing, as we don't normally have an AltGr key here, but I do know   
   about it by word of mouth.   
      
    NB>> I also believe I was getting the DAILYUTF from you at some point,   
    NB>> but possibly when your system went down, and stayed down for some   
    NB>> time, it was stopped for some reason (I don't think I ever turned   
    NB>> it off).   
      
    > You want me to turn it on again?   
      
   Sure, please. I still have all the same config in place here to receive it.   
      
   I believe I was also receiving this echo from you before you went down as   
   well. It doesn't look like I paused or disabled anything with our link (I just   
   linked with someone else at the time), so it must have stopped at your end   
   when you reconfigured.   
      
    > At the moment no one in Z1 participates in de dailyutf,   
      
   That's a bummer. I figured Andrew, at the very least, would have been   
   interested.. as he was the only one from Z1 that jumped on the IPV6 bandwagon   
   before I did.   
      
    > Yes. When I was RC I also did it. It is not hard, the UTF part is mostly   
    > a copy of the ASCII setup. Except for the file names and the ALLOW8BIT   
    > setting.   
      
   Got it. I'll take a look at it when I have some free time this weekend.   
      
    > No. Here in Western Europe the default code page for DOS was 850. That   
    > is still the case in the Windows CLI. In the Linux community Latin-1 is   
    > popular.   
      
   I think most of my Windows applications are now either ISO8859-1 or UTF-8. But   
   I'm on Windows 11, so it probably started to change some time ago. As for   
   Linux, ISO-8859-1 may have been popular at some point, but these days most   
   distributions are installed with UTF-8 as the default (which is a good thing,   
   IMO).   
      
    > ASCII is a subset of nearly all charactersets in use, with the exception   
    > of the obsolete national 7 bit character sets.   
      
   I imagine we probably won't see much of those national 7 bit sets any more,   
   unless someone comes online with some very vintage hardware. ;)   
      
    > I recall Björn mentioning that is is Latin-1. But does it mnatter? The   
    > point is that it is NOT UTF-8 and therefore an error in he UTF nodelist.   
      
   True, and let's not forget that it's an error in the original nodelist, as   
   well.   
      
   Regards,   
   Nick   
      
   ... Sarcasm: because beating people up is illegal.   
   --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20240309   
    * Origin: _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)   
   SEEN-BY: 4/0 90/0 104/119 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 153/757   
   SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 30 50 110 700 701 203/0 218/700 220/20 221/0   
   SEEN-BY: 221/6 226/30 44 50 227/114 229/110 114 310 317 426 428 470   
   SEEN-BY: 229/700 705 240/1120 5832 280/464 5003 5006 5555 291/111   
   SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 341/66 234 423/120 460/58   
   SEEN-BY: 467/888 712/848 770/1 900/0 902/0 26 905/0 5020/400   
   PATH: 154/10 280/464 341/66 902/26 229/426