home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   UTF-8      UTF-8 encoded messages      382 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 286 of 382   
   Michiel van der Vlist to Nicholas Boel   
   UTF-8 nodelist report   
   10 Mar 25 15:26:07   
   
   TID: FMail-W32 2.3.0.1-B20240319   
   RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   CHRS: UTF-8 4   
   MSGID: 2:280/5555 67cefb2e   
   REPLY: 1:154/10 67ce4c4d   
   Hello Nicholas,   
      
   On Sunday March 09 2025 21:03, you wrote to me:   
      
    >> Some keys have been made into "dead keys" by the driver. E,g, to get an   
    >> 'e' with diaresis I first press the key for the double quote, followed   
    >> by the 'e'. To type the double quote itself, i have to press that key   
    >> twice. It is easy once you are used to it.   
      
    NB> After 30+ years of not doing it, it may be difficult to get used to   
    NB> it.   
      
   After the dead key method was introduced I got accustomed to it fairly   
   quickly. And that was also after several decades of not doing it...   
      
   Then again here in The Neterlands we are used to dealing with accents and   
   diaresis. They are paty of out language.   
      
    NB> I'm not saying it's impossible, as I can do ALT-0235 to get the   
    NB> desired "ë",   
      
   ALT 137 in DOS.   
   There is the alternative of "AltGr". The right Alt key acts as a second   
   "shift" key. E.g. "AltGr 5" is the Euro sign.   
      
    NB> but it's a bit of a challenge to try to remember to do   
    NB> every time I type my name. :)   
      
   Yeah, that's awfull.   
      
   In DOS there was the option of defining a keyboard macro for things like that.   
   I don't know about Windows or Linus. Did not need it any mor4e.   
      
    >> Understood. So I take it you are not really interested in the UTF   
    >> nodelist project to get your name with an 'ë' in the nodelist?   
      
    NB> I actually thought we discussed this some time ago.   
      
   Yes we did, but I do not recall the details.   
      
    NB> I also believe I was getting the DAILYUTF from you at some point, but   
    NB> possibly when your system went down, and stayed down for some time, it   
    NB> was stopped for some reason (I don't think I ever turned it off).   
      
   You want me to turn it on again?   
      
    NB> Is anyone in zone 1 involved (I'm unsure if ZC1 is able to forward it   
    NB> on for me)? Or would the submissions need to go to Ward, since I'm an   
    NB> RC?   
      
   At the moment no one in Z1 participates in de dailyutf,   
      
    >> The ZC does double processing. One for the ASCII list and one for   
    >> the UTF list. For the UTF list MakeNl is run with ALLOW8BIT set.   
    >> For regions that dot not participate in the UTF list, the ZC uses   
    >> the ASCII segment for both list. For regions that do participate,   
    >> their seperate UTF region segment is used for the UTF list.   
      
    NB> I suppose anyone involved would have to double process with and   
    NB> without the ALLOW8BIT option, correct?   
      
   Yes. When I was RC I also did it. It is not hard, the UTF part is mostly a   
   copy of the ASCII setup. Except for the file names and the ALLOW8BIT setting.   
      
    >> RC20 does not participate in the UTF nodelist project. He does not   
    >> send two different segments. But his segment is not pure ASCII, it   
    >> contain some characters in Latin-1. So for the ASCII list, the ZC's   
    >> MakNl substitutes question marks for the non ASCII characters. For   
    >> the UTF list, they are passed "as is". But that was only was   
    >> noticed after I started my weekly error report.   
      
    NB> Is it even LATIN-1? Or does it just end up that way because of CP437   
    NB> probably turns into ISO-8859-1 on Windows?   
      
   No. Here in Western Europe the default code page for DOS was 850. That is   
   still the case in the Windows CLI. In the Linux community Latin-1 is popular.   
      
    NB> Isn't CP437 -> ISO-8859-1 basically the same as ASCII -> UTF-8 where   
    NB> everything in the former is also represented in the latter (then   
    NB> again, ASCII would be part of many, if not every charset)?   
      
   ASCII is a subset of nearly all charactersets in use, with the exception of   
   the obsolete national 7 bit character sets.   
      
   I recall Björn mentioning that is is Latin-1. But does it mnatter? The point   
   is that it is NOT UTF-8 and therefore an error in he UTF nodelist.   
      
      
   Cheers, Michiel   
      
   --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303   
    * Origin: Nieuw Schnøørd (2:280/5555)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/19 16/0 19/37 104/119 105/81 106/201 123/130 128/187 142/104   
   SEEN-BY: 153/757 7715 154/10 30 50 110 700 701 201/0 203/0 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 218/840 220/20 221/1 6 242 360 226/30 44 50 227/114 229/110   
   SEEN-BY: 229/114 310 317 426 428 470 700 705 230/0 240/5832 280/464   
   SEEN-BY: 280/5003 5555 291/111 292/789 854 301/1 310/31 320/119 219   
   SEEN-BY: 320/319 2119 322/762 335/364 341/66 234 423/81 460/58 902/26   
   SEEN-BY: 5019/40 5020/1042 5075/35   
   PATH: 280/5555 154/10 221/6 1 320/219 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca