Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    UFO    |    Debating & discussing Planet Crackpot...    |    366 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 90 of 366    |
|    Meghan Fitzgerald to All    |
|    SUBJECT: The Majestic Twelve     |
|    05 Jul 25 06:32:04    |
      TZUTC: -0400       MSGID: 191.fidonet_ufo@1:3634/60 2cce35e3       PID: Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928       TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928       BBSID: RICKSBBS       CHRS: UTF-8 4       SUBJECT: The Majestic Twelve FILE: UFO1060              PART 17               As any good detective can tell, motivation is a helpful key       in solv-ing any crime or mystery. Who would stand to gain by the situation       at hand? Perhaps a little of this line of reasoning would help in       solving the current mystery of AQUARIUS/MJ-12. The revelation of a       UFO-related project by the name of AQUARIUS first appeared on the       scene in what has commonly been referred to as the "NASA-telex"       [AQUARIUS.DOC]. This is the allegedly genuine document which describes       several pieces of photographic film relating to incidents at Kirtland       AFB and the case of Paul Bennewitz. As most knowledgeable people are       aware, this document relates quite a bit of interesting information       pertaining to official interest in UFOs as well as mentioning the       existence of project AQUARIUS and something called "MJ-12". However,       several key areas in this document were deleted by either the original       source or by the recipient. It is interesting to note that there is       a retyped version of this document which has circulated with the deletions       filled-in, but with no explanation as to who retyped it or how the       previously deleted areas were uncovered.               Reportedly Peter Gersten was shown this document in 1983 and       so it would seem that it has been around for several years. But if       Gersten was the original recipient he has not revealed where he obtained       it or from whom. This document would appear to be closely tied to       the events at Kirtland AFB in 1980 inasmuch as it mentions Bennewitz       and the Air Force interest in UFO sightings over military bases. Could       the release of this document be related to the release of the initial       document(s) concerning the events at Kirtland? [KIRTLND1.DOC, KIRTLND2.DOC]       William Moore has stated that he was first given the initial Kirtland       documents in Washington DC in early 1982 by an unnamed source. And       there have been several rumors circulated concerning heated arguments       between Moore and Gersten over the means by which Gersten obtained       these documents. Rumors aside, if Moore received his documents over       one year after the incidents occurred then whoever gave him these       copies must have had access to them either from AFOSI files in Washington       or from the original sender at Kirtland. There are indications that       William Moore received his copies from Richard Doty, the AFOSI Special       Agent at Kirtland AFB. Other sources have also reported that Doty       was involved in an effort to get information of this nature out to       certain individuals for purposes unknown. And so it seems possible       that Doty was responsible for the Kirtland documents and perhaps the       "NASA-telex" being released as he would have been in a position to       have access to such information. Regardless, it would fall to serious       UFO researchers to attempt to verify if the documents conveyed valid       information, or disinformation.               As interest began to focus on AQUARIUS and "MJ-12" several       different FOIA requests were filed with various government agencies       to try to garn-ish information on these subjects, but as recently       as 1986 most of the leading figures in Ufology were convinced that       the document was a forgery and that Project AQUARIUS was nonexistent.              In 1985 I had filed several different requests with government agencies       requesting information on three projects: Sigma, Snowbird and Aquarius;       as well as any information pertaining to MJ-12 or Majestic-12. I       specifically did not mention any connection or interest dealing with       UFOs in these requests. With the exception of the National Security       Agency every response I received was a denial of any knowledge of       any of these subjects or titles. While they stated that Sigma and       Snowbird were "not projects of this agency" and that they had no knowledge       of MJ-12, they estimated that search fees for all information on Project       AQUARIUS would be $15,000! It would appear that this is a rather expansive       project. After several subsequent requests for clarification and to       simply send the initial document which initiated the project the NSA       stated that the project did not deal with "UFOs" and that as I would       not be paying the fees they were concluding action on my requests.       Subsequent appeals only clarified that Project AQUARIUS was classified       Top Secret and that release of any portion of it could pose "grave       danger to the national security." [AQUANSA.DOC]               Several individuals have considered the statement by the NSA       that AQUARIUS does not deal with UFOs to be patently honest, and perhaps       this is the truth. However I believe that to have expected the NSA       to "rollover" and openly reveal otherwise would be naive to say the       least. It seems paradoxical that some "researchers" both expect these       agencies to be deceptive but will readily accept some statements as       totally accurate. I believe that there are sufficient reasons to suspect       that the NSA project may actually be the project which is indicated       in the "NASA-telex" which originally mentioned it and MJ-12.               In the process of trying to verify the above document I had       addressed a series of letters to what was designated the 7602 Air       Intelligence Group (7602 AINTELG), as of 1983 known as the Air Force       Special Activities Center. A Branch of the Air Force Intelligence       Service, the 7602 AINTELG deals with human resource intelligence,       much the same as the 4602 AINTELG which is known to have aided Edward       Ruppelt in his investi-gations several years ago. This may or may       not be coincidence and could be an interesting avenue for further       research. Nevertheless, in the process of trying to get information       on this group I had been receiving somewhat evasive response letters       from AFIS. In a conversation with an Air Force source in which I had       referred to my problems in obtaining information on this group I was       informed that perhaps this is due to the fact that "they are a branch       of the NSA!" This was at the time my first indication that there may       be some NSA involvement, and was prior to my letters to NSA itself.       Within a few months I was to learn another interesting fact pointing       to the NSA.               With the aid of well known researcher Thomas Adams I was notified       of a person who reportedly had heard a very interesting statement       concerning the initial AQUARIUS/MJ-12 document. After speaking with       this gentleman personally I was firmly convinced that the information       he was relating was accurate as it had been told to him. He related       that he had been told personally that this document had been changed       in two ways, and that he had been told this by the individual who had       changed it. Although both changes were not revealed, he had been told       that the reference in the document to "NASA" had originally been "NSA"!       And who was the person doing the telling ...none other than William       Moore. In a brief conversation with Moore after this in which I asked       him if he had any knowledge of this he simply stated "No comment."              end of part 17                       **********************************************        * THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo *        **********************************************              Meg       telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23       http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080       --- SBBSecho 3.14-Win32        * Origin: Rick's BBS - telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23 (1:3634/60)       SEEN-BY: 1/120 18/0 80/1 105/81 106/201 123/0 126 180 525 755 3001       SEEN-BY: 123/3002 124/5016 128/187 129/14 305 153/757 7715 154/30       SEEN-BY: 154/110 203/0 218/700 220/6 221/0 1 222/2 226/30 227/114       SEEN-BY: 229/110 317 426 428 664 700 705 240/1120 5832 250/1 263/1       SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 5003 5006 291/111 292/854 8125 301/1 320/219       SEEN-BY: 322/757 335/364 341/66 234 396/45 423/120 460/58 633/280       SEEN-BY: 712/848 1321 770/1 902/26 2320/105 3634/0 12 56 57 60 5020/400       SEEN-BY: 5075/35       PATH: 3634/60 12 222/2 263/1 280/464 292/854 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca