Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    UFO    |    Debating & discussing Planet Crackpot...    |    366 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 245 of 366    |
|    Denise Stevens to All    |
|    SUBJECT: A WEE BIT ON CROP CIRCLES     |
|    02 Dec 25 07:33:31    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 350.fidonet_ufo@1:3634/60 2d9413f9       PID: Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928       TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928       BBSID: RICKSBBS       CHRS: UTF-8 4       SUBJECT: A WEE BIT ON CROP CIRCLES FILE: UFO1210                              5/20/90        By Bryon Smith               Strange Things are Afoot at the "Circle (R)"        O*****[============- -============]*****O               One thing that I know for sure is that "you never can be to        sure" what is going on and what the truth really is about        certain things.               Just a few days ago my little sister called me on the phone        and said "I am returning your call." I set there for a moment        and said "what ?" She said that I had called her that morning        just before 8am and that she had just gotten the message and was        returning my call. Quickly I questioned myself and recounted        all of my actions that morning up to that very moment and I said        "I haven't called anyone this morning, in fact I have only been        on the phone once this morning and that was to answer a call        from the wife, and this is the second time on the phone this        morning."               Gina didn't think long about what I had said before she        came back with a "well it sure sounds like you on the recording        and it gave this same number."               Well it was my number all right. She played the tape for        me and I took a recording of it. Sure enough it was my voice,        and I had even give the time of the call and my voice phone        number both of which were correct. It was just as if I had made        the call, only one small catch, I had not made that call.               Her answering machine is computerize and counts the number        of calls that come into her office and it had counted that        message as a new call.               That morning she came into the office before 8am and had        3 messages on the first part of the tape. She listened to them        and then reset the tape as she always does every morning. The        machine always records right over the top of the last messages        unless you tell it to save the message. She left the office for        a little bit and came back and checked and the machine said        there were two new messages and she played them back. There was        my voice as big as life, it gave the time and made mention of        our elder sister who is deceased as if she were still alive.        This made me think it was an old message, but the tape had been        recorded over, it had run several other messages over the top of        any old messages that might have been at the start of the tape.        If that had been an old message it would have been from last        December and that would have made it at least 4 months old. The        next thing is that the computer counts all of the calls that        come in since the last time they were reviewed and it said there        was two new calls which counted "my" message as a new call.               The next message after "mine" was from her husband and        after it the machine gave the date and time of the call. We        noticed that after my message it had not given the date and time        after the call but it was my voice that had given the time of        the call. This was unusual to say the least. It had counted it        as a call, yet had not posted the time and date after the call.        It played it and counted it as a call so why didn't it put the        time and date after it as it normally does ? Right after that        was her husband and it counted the time and date as normal.               How could an old message come through an old tape as if it        were a new message ? How could the computer count it as a new        call and not put the time and date after the call ? The time        was right on the money and was given by "my voice." Had I        actually made the call the machine would have placed the time        and date after the call and there would have been little doubt        that I had made the call myself and just "forgotten about it" or        perhaps was lying and saying that I had not made the call when        in fact I had. The oddity itself indicates that something out        of the normal had taken place though and gave certain evidence        to prove that I was telling the truth and I had not made that        call.               The fact that her husband had called right after my "call"        had proven very close to the fact when the call had been        recorded and it was right in the correct time slot.               I told her of a UFO crash that had not been to many days        ago at which certain people had gathered to talk about the        event. Certain other people were seen and some even talked to        others there and later when they were contacted by these people        about the crash they knew nothing about it. They said they had        not been there at all and could prove it. So how is it these        other people swear that they saw and even talked with certain of        these other people if they were not there ? And what about the        UFO crash ? Did the thing just up and vanish without a trace        and with no other "media" reports ? Was it as if it had never        actually happened ? If so then what did happen ?               So strange things are afoot at the "Circle (R)" and if you        see or hear from someone who later says they were not there or        had not tried to contact you, and don't know what you are        talking about don't be surprised.               ...Bryon                       **********************************************        * THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo *        **********************************************              Denise       telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23       http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080       --- SBBSecho 3.14-Win32        * Origin: Rick's BBS - telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23 (1:3634/60)       SEEN-BY: 1/120 18/0 50/22 105/81 106/201 123/0 126 180 525 755 3001       SEEN-BY: 123/3002 124/5016 128/187 129/14 305 153/757 7715 154/30       SEEN-BY: 154/110 203/0 218/700 220/6 221/0 222/2 226/30 227/114 229/110       SEEN-BY: 229/112 134 317 426 428 470 664 700 705 240/1120 5832 250/1       SEEN-BY: 263/1 266/512 280/464 5003 5006 291/111 292/854 8125 301/1       SEEN-BY: 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 396/45 423/120 460/58 256 1124       SEEN-BY: 460/5858 633/280 712/848 1321 770/1 902/26 2320/105 3634/0       SEEN-BY: 3634/12 56 57 60 5020/400 8912 5054/30 5075/35       PATH: 3634/60 12 222/2 263/1 280/464 460/58 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca