REPLY: 1:153/7001 679fa5c6   
   MSGID: 1:154/10 679fb9f2   
   CHRS: UTF-8 4   
   TZUTC: -0600   
   TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2024-03-02   
   Hey Maurice!   
      
   On Sun, 02 Feb 2025 17:05:10 , you wrote ..   
      
    >> That seemed abnormally quick.   
      
    > Not really.  According to kernel.org;   
      
    > mainline:   6.13          2025-01-19   
    > stable:     6.13.1        2025-02-01   
      
   But then you had 6.12.11 on Jan 23 and 6.12.12 on Feb 1 in between? What's the   
   reasoning with all that?   
      
    > I haven't had a chance to check.  It just so happened to present itself   
    > (6.13.1) when I was upgrading one of the four machines I am working on.   
    > So far twon of them are both running 6.12.11 since 6.12.12 hadn't   
    > presented itself until yesterday, which was after I upgraded them to   
    > 6.12.11.  I still have one more machine to get up to date, and it will   
    > probably be a 6.12.12 kernel which is listed as 'stable'.   
      
   I'm guessing 6.12.x is still receiving security patches or something while   
   6.13.x is now currently being worked on? I don't know their versioning scheme,   
   which is the only reason I'm asking.   
      
   Regards,   
   Nick   
      
   ... He who laughs last, thinks slowest.   
   --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20240309   
    * Origin: _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)   
   SEEN-BY: 103/705 104/119 105/81 106/201 120/616 124/5016 128/187 153/757   
   SEEN-BY: 153/7001 7715 154/10 30 50 110 700 203/0 218/700 220/20 90   
   SEEN-BY: 221/0 6 226/18 30 44 50 227/114 229/110 114 206 300 317 400   
   SEEN-BY: 229/426 428 470 664 700 705 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464   
   SEEN-BY: 280/5003 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66   
   SEEN-BY: 341/234 342/200 396/45 460/58 467/888 633/267 280 384 410   
   SEEN-BY: 633/418 509 2744 712/848 770/1 902/26 2320/105 3634/12 5020/400   
   SEEN-BY: 5075/35   
   PATH: 154/10 280/464 633/280 229/426