TZUTC: -0600   
   MSGID: 237.tuxpower@1:154/700 2bb77714   
   REPLY: 1:153/7001 67513cc9   
   PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/6e166f09d Dec 02 202 GCC 14.2.1   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.23-Linux master/6e166f09d Dec 02 2024 13:11 GCC 14.2.1   
   BBSID: PHARCYDE   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   NOTE: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)   
   Hello Maurice,   
      
   On Wed, Dec 04 2024 23:40:25 -0600, you wrote ..   
      
   > I had to adjust the fill to one character less in nano than in fold in    
   > order for them to produce the same result.  I am guessing the same for    
   > vim.   
      
   > I am more confused now than I was when I just bash scripted replies    
   > with quoted text.  However I think we're on the right track if our    
   > goal is to make this more compatible with a number of editors, nano    
   > being a very good choice for most.   
      
   Do you think maybe nano and/or vim wraps at the 68th column and _then_ adds in   
   the space at the end of the line (since there is an option to retain that   
   space or remove it)?   
      
   For example, in nano, try "set fill 69" in conjunction with "set justifytrim"   
   which removes the whitespace at the end of the lines.   
      
   Regards,   
   Nick   
      
   ... He who laughs last, thinks slowest.   
   --- SBBSecho 3.23-Linux   
    * Origin: _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (1:154/700)   
   SEEN-BY: 4/0 80/1 90/0 103/705 104/119 105/81 106/201 120/616 124/5016   
   SEEN-BY: 128/187 153/757 7001 7715 154/10 30 50 700 203/0 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 220/20 90 221/0 6 226/18 30 44 50 227/114 229/110 114 206   
   SEEN-BY: 229/300 317 400 426 428 664 700 705 240/1120 5832 266/512   
   SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 282/1038 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219   
   SEEN-BY: 322/757 341/66 200 234 342/200 396/45 460/58 467/888 633/280   
   SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 900/0 102 106 902/0 6 19 26 905/0 930/1 2320/105   
   SEEN-BY: 3634/12 5020/400 5075/35   
   PATH: 154/700 10 280/464 341/66 902/26 229/426