Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    TUXPOWER    |    Advocacy for the Linux operating system    |    1,237 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 886 of 1,237    |
|    August Abolins to Nicholas Boel    |
|    the solution would be to eliminate all h    |
|    30 Nov 24 08:51:00    |
      MSGID: 2:221/1.58@fidonet 1aef8f46       REPLY: 227.tuxpower@1:154/700 2badb2bc       PID: OpenXP/5.0.58 (Win32)       CHRS: ASCII 1       TZUTC: -0500       Hello Nicholas!              ** On Thursday 28.11.24 - 08:19, Nicholas Boel wrote to All:               >> Just trying to encourage utilizing other echos as a means to        >> invite other people to join in if the topic is of interest.               NB> If the topic is of interest to anyone, they can definitely        NB> chime in right here, too!              That's if the topic is linux, but you know that I am referring        to other topics (ie, off-topic) that might crop up here.                      NB> Unless you're referring to spam/cross posting our        NB> conversation to multiple echos to see if anyone bites?        NB> Though, I'm not really interested in chasing our not-so-        NB> very imporatant conversation around Fidonet, either.              It's not chasing at all. It's just going to the proper room to        be on topic.                      >> THAT is the way to build "ones that there's actual        >> conversation in" too. ;)               NB> If we did that, this echo would end up empty, then. I        NB> don't think it matters where we have our conversation. If        NB> people want in, they'll join no matter where the        NB> conversation is taking place.              If you're ok with off-topic messages in any echo, what's the        point in having named echos? The echos in FTN may as well be        just a number. Echos have a name for a reason - to indicate a        topic. And if the topic veers, there are other appropriate        echos to take it there.                      NB> At the rate of decline of this network, we should be happy        NB> we have any conversation at all, to be honest. At this        NB> point, there's more robot postings in Fidonet than actual        NB> conversation. :)              At this rate we should encourage good stewardship of echos and        support the available ones too, unlike what has happend to        newsgroups filled with totally unrelated things in their areas.              Sadly, yes.. FTN/echos is not necessarily a growing tech. But        we shouldn't allow it to become like the garbage bin that many        newsgroups have become.              FUTURE4FIDO echo is a fine place to have this conversation.        The echo is one of several that participates in the Telegram        BBS project which facilites bridging smartphone users to FTN        users. I believe the Telegram BBS is written entirely in perl.              --         ../|ug              --- OpenXP 5.0.58        * Origin: (2:221/1.58)       SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 153/757 7715       SEEN-BY: 154/10 30 203/0 214/22 218/0 1 601 700 840 850 860 870 880       SEEN-BY: 218/930 940 221/1 6 226/30 227/114 229/110 114 206 300 317       SEEN-BY: 229/400 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464       SEEN-BY: 280/5003 282/1038 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757       SEEN-BY: 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/81 460/58 467/888 633/280 712/848       SEEN-BY: 770/1 902/26 5020/400 5075/35       PATH: 221/1 280/464 103/705 218/700 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca