MSGID: 2:221/6.0 65e44746   
   REPLY: 2:280/464.113 65e3ffaf   
   PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 kco 20240209   
   NOTE: Sylpheed 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32).   
   CHRS: UTF-8 4   
   TZUTC: 0200   
   TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2024-02-05   
   On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 04:42:22 GMT   
   "Maurice Kinal -> Maurice Kinal" <113@464.280.2> wrote:   
      
    MK> Should we carry on or have we seen enough?   
      
   Sylpheed seems to add the Re: and thus cuts off the text at the beginning of   
   the subject.  I don't see where the Re: can be disabled.  Personally, I don't   
   like the addition of Re:   
      
   As per your question, I think we've seen enough. People who prefer to   
   communicate in Hebrew would simply use the tools that handle it properly, such   
   as systems that support FTN<->nntp+utf8   
      
   Wrt to the subject line, users would quickly learn to keep the subject line   
   short.   
      
   So.. the fault is not FTN per se. FTN was built to support an English-speaking   
   community. And as you have discovered, just supporting utf-8 is not enough   
   espectially if the the requirement is to support languages that typically   
   require writing/reading right-to-left.   
      
   ---   
    * Origin: news://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)   
   SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 128/260 135/225 153/757   
   SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 214/22 218/0 1 601 700 820 840 850 860 870   
   SEEN-BY: 218/880 930 940 221/1 6 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 206   
   SEEN-BY: 229/307 317 400 426 428 470 664 700 266/512 280/464 282/1038   
   SEEN-BY: 291/111 301/1 113 320/219 322/757 335/364 341/66 234 342/200   
   SEEN-BY: 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 5075/35   
   PATH: 221/6 301/1 218/700 229/426