On 06/06/16, Maurice Kinal said the following...   
       
    MK> Should we try it with a direct netmail to you?     
      
   Can do anytime.   
      
    MK> If it works then I'm inclined to use it since it has no datetime stamp so   
    MK> it makes it very easy to deploy once it has been created for any   
    MK> particular node.  Type 2 and 2+ have far too much useless crap to   
    MK> generate every time a pktheader needs to be created.  With 2.2 I am   
    MK> thinking it could be a pregenerated field within a configuration file for   
    MK> tossing and/or packing purposes.   
      
   I'm not familiar with the different pkt types but it sounds like 2.2 is a   
   good choice. Simpler is always better.   
      
    MK> What version does Mystic use by default?   
      
   2+ is always used by mystic. A choice of what pkt type may be in the future   
   since we are working on a couple of strange issues at the moment. A 2.2 pkt   
   might solve that but we need to get more input and look at the details.   
      
    Ttyl :-),   
            Al   
      
   --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A17 (Linux)   
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757)