MSGID: 1:153/7001 698ff247
CHRS: UTF-8 4
Hey Alan!
I should have posted these different usb sata adapters just to make sure
everything as it should be. Same machine, same drive, different cables on
different usb version interfaces.
usb-a sata adapter:
:read !dmesg
[ 8055.515419] usb 9-1: new SuperSpeed USB device number 3 using xhci_hcd
[ 8055.527245] usb 9-1: New USB device found, idVendor=152d, idProduct=0576,
bcdDevice=12.14
[ 8055.527249] usb 9-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2,
SerialNumber=3
[ 8055.527252] usb 9-1: Product: SABRENT
[ 8055.527254] usb 9-1: Manufacturer: SABRENT
[ 8055.527256] usb 9-1: SerialNumber: 0000000000015
[ 8055.528742] scsi host0: uas
[ 8055.529334] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access SABRENT 1214
PQ: 0 ANSI: 6
[ 8056.232787] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 976773168 512-byte logical blocks: (500
GB/466 GiB)
[ 8056.232791] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 4096-byte physical blocks
[ 8056.233008] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[ 8056.233011] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 53 00 00 08
[ 8056.233382] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled,
doesn't support DPO or FUA
[ 8056.257467] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Preferred minimum I/O size 4096 bytes
[ 8056.257470] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Optimal transfer size 33553920 bytes not a
multiple of preferred minimum block size (4096 bytes)
[ 8056.286832] sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4
[ 8056.286968] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk
usb-c sata adapter:
:read !dmesg
[ 933.693549] usb 7-1: new SuperSpeed USB device number 3 using xhci_hcd
[ 933.705366] usb 7-1: New USB device found, idVendor=174c, idProduct=55aa,
bcdDevice= 1.00
[ 933.705370] usb 7-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=2, Product=3,
SerialNumber=1
[ 933.705373] usb 7-1: Product: Ugreen Storage Device
[ 933.705375] usb 7-1: Manufacturer: Ugreen
[ 933.705378] usb 7-1: SerialNumber: 0219112201A7
[ 933.706581] scsi host0: uas
[ 933.707261] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access Samsung SSD 870 EVO 500G 0
PQ: 0 ANSI: 6
[ 933.708870] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 976773168 512-byte logical blocks: (500
GB/466 GiB)
[ 933.708945] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[ 933.708949] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 43 00 00 00
[ 933.709056] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled,
doesn't support DPO or FUA
[ 933.732720] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Preferred minimum I/O size 512 bytes
[ 933.732723] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Optimal transfer size 33553920 bytes
[ 933.753451] sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4
[ 933.753663] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk
Given that the drive is slower than either interfaces the usb version
shouldn't make a difference ... or does it? Looking at the optimal transfer
size 33553920 bytes, I would suspect that there isn't a difference but I have
to wonder about the "not a multiple of preferred minimum block size (4096
bytes)" on the usb-a adapter makes me a tad wary.
Writing a huge file - perhaps a slackware-current iso? - ought to settle the
issue but my hunch is that if there is a difference then the usb-c sata
adapter will be the winner. The output itself inspires greater confidence.
Дуже груви,
Maurice
-o -o o- o- -o o- o- o- o- o- o- -o
(\ (\ /) /) (\ /) /) /) /) /) /) (\
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
... Deað bið sella eorla gehwylcum þonne edwitlif.
Death is better for any warrior than a life of disgrace.
--- GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
* Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001)
SEEN-BY: 50/22 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 129/14 134/100
SEEN-BY: 153/135 143 148 151 153 757 7001 7715 154/10 30 110 203/0
SEEN-BY: 218/700 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 134 206 300 317
SEEN-BY: 229/400 426 428 470 664 700 705 240/1120 5832 263/1 266/512
SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757
SEEN-BY: 341/66 234 342/11 200 396/45 460/58 256 1124 5858 633/280
SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 902/26 3634/12 5020/400 8912 5054/30 5075/35
PATH: 153/7001 757 280/464 460/58 229/426
|
