Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    TUXPOWER    |    Advocacy for the Linux operating system    |    1,237 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,099 of 1,237    |
|    Tanausu M. to Maurice Kinal    |
|    Are QWK packets still the way?    |
|    26 Dec 25 16:52:24    |
      REPLY: 1:153/7001 694eaea3       MSGID: 2:341/207.1 694ebdb7       CHRS: UTF-8 2       TZUTC: 0000       TID: CrashMail II/Linux 1.5.1              Hello Maurice!              26 Dec 25 15:49, you wrote to Alan Ianson:               MK> I agree with offline mail but definetly *NOT* QWK ... or bluewave        MK> while we're at it. However given the lack of suitable client/server        MK> applications I can readily understand the attraction of multimail QWK        MK> / Synchronet ftp setup.               MK> Personally I think the idea requires a total overhaul.              Yes, if you're not interested in network emails, NNTP is fine and simple.              --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20250409        * Origin: Citrick BBS citlmbbs.synchro.net (2:341/207.1)       SEEN-BY: 50/22 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 129/14 153/757       SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 30 110 203/0 218/700 221/0 6 226/30 227/114       SEEN-BY: 229/110 112 134 206 300 317 400 426 428 470 664 700 705 240/1120       SEEN-BY: 240/5832 263/1 266/512 280/464 5003 291/111 292/8125 301/1       SEEN-BY: 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66 200 207 234 342/200 396/45       SEEN-BY: 460/58 256 1124 5858 633/280 712/848 770/1 902/26 5020/400       SEEN-BY: 5020/8912 5054/30 5075/35       PATH: 341/207 66 280/464 460/58 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca