Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    TUXPOWER    |    Advocacy for the Linux operating system    |    1,237 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,089 of 1,237    |
|    Cem Uzunoglu to Maurice Kinal    |
|    Are QWK packets still the    |
|    26 Dec 25 03:14:10    |
      TZUTC: -0800       MSGID: 392.fidonet_tuxpower@1:105/45 2db3a58a       REPLY: 1:153/7001 694dda37       PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/2119bfac2 Nov 24 202 GCC 14.2.1       TID: SBBSecho 3.23-Linux master/2119bfac2 Nov 24 2024 21:15 GCC 14.2.1       BBSID: X4D2ORG       CHRS: CP437 2       -=> Maurice Kinal wrote to Cem Uzunoglu <=-               MK> I am guessing whatever way you posted the above question.       I used MultiMail with nvim editor on the linux terminal.                MK> I sure hope not ... QWK sucks ... always has.       The main thing here is I don't know if there is a way to sync my down/reply       packets without going through the login process of a BBS.                      ... Direct from the Ministry of Silly Walks       === MultiMail/Linux v0.52       --- SBBSecho 3.23-Linux        * Origin: 4d2 dot org // bbs.4d2.org // +1 541 442 4422 (1:105/45)       SEEN-BY: 105/1 7 10 11 44 45 81 500 106/201 128/187 129/14 153/7715       SEEN-BY: 154/110 218/700 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 134 206 300 317       SEEN-BY: 229/400 426 428 470 664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757       SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 5075/35       PATH: 105/45 81 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca