Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    TUXPOWER    |    Advocacy for the Linux operating system    |    1,237 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,085 of 1,237    |
|    August Abolins to Cem Uzunoglu    |
|    Re: Are QWK packets still the way?    |
|    26 Dec 25 03:08:14    |
      MSGID: 2:221/360.0 694ddffa       REPLY: 386.fidonet_tuxpower@1:105/45 2db2fbc1       PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 kco 20251012       NOTE: Sylpheed 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32)       CHRS: CP437 2       TZUTC: 0200       On Thu, 25 Dec 2025 13:09:50 -0800       "Cem Uzunoglu -> All" <0@45.105.1> wrote:               CU> Hi all,        CU> It's been a very long time away from the BBS scene. What is the        CU> fastest/user friendliest way to participate in FidoNet nowadays? Is        CU> downloading QWK packages still the way to go? Any other more practical        CU> methods you use?        CU> --- SBBSecho 3.23-Linux        CU> * Origin: 4d2 dot org // bbs.4d2.org // +1 541 442 4422 (1:105/45)              I'd say *this* (nntp) method is "easiest".              But most of the time, I use OpenXP (see https:/openxp.kolico.ca)              ---         * Origin: news://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/360.0)       SEEN-BY: 1/19 100 16/0 19/10 37 105/81 106/201 123/130 128/187 129/14       SEEN-BY: 142/104 153/757 7715 154/10 110 203/0 218/700 840 221/1 6       SEEN-BY: 221/360 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 134 206 300 317 400 426       SEEN-BY: 229/428 470 664 700 705 240/5832 266/512 280/464 5003 5006       SEEN-BY: 291/111 301/1 320/119 219 319 2119 322/757 762 335/364 341/66       SEEN-BY: 341/234 342/200 396/45 423/81 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26       SEEN-BY: 5075/35       PATH: 221/6 1 320/219 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca