REPLY: 2:280/464.47 6007e760   
   MSGID: 3:633/267.7 602c6c24   
   CHRS: LATIN-1 2   
   TZUTC: 1100   
   TID: hpt/fbsd 1.9.0-cur 2018-12-08   
   On 20 Jan 21 09:18:48, Oli (2:280/464.47) wrote to All:   
      
    Ol> Is there a known bug with the SQUISH LINK command? Message linking   
    Ol> doesn't work properly on my Linux armv7 build. It seems to link every   
    Ol> message to the previous and the next, but only if there is a REPLY   
    Ol> kludge. Looks like this in Golded:   
      
    Ol> [...]   
      
    Ol> Any ideas? Does this happen on DOS, OS/2 or Windows too or is it a   
    Ol> Linux specific bug?   
      
   MSGID/REPLY threading worked well in the original 1.11 release on DOS & OS/2.   
      
   I can't vouch for the Linux port of Squish. I don't think it got a lot of   
   testing. Among other things you might have C structure alignment/padding   
   inconsistencies on ARM that weren't present on the i386 build.   
      
   I recall Bob Jones disappeared from Fido only a few years after porting   
   Maximus (which included Squish) to Linux in 2003.   
      
   Maybe it was Scott Dudley in disguise! Probably not.   
      
   These days I think everyone using Squish bases on Linux/BSD are using Husky's   
   HPTLINK. I vaguely recall HPTLINK is a bit more intelligent than SQUISH LINK   
   anyway.   
      
   --- GoldED+/BSD 1.1.5-b20180707   
    * Origin: X (3:633/267.7)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 129/305 226/30 227/114   
   SEEN-BY: 227/702 229/101 424 426 550 664 1016 1017 240/5832 249/206   
   SEEN-BY: 249/317 400 292/854 317/3 322/757 342/200 633/0 267 280 281   
   SEEN-BY: 633/412 416 509 640/1384 712/848   
   PATH: 633/267 280 229/426