TID: Mystic BBS 1.12 A47   
   MSGID: 2:250/5 bb379585   
   REPLY: 11691.trek@1:218/700 2555c0a2   
   TZUTC: 0100   
    KW> -=> Chris Krascek wrote to DaveW <=-   
    KW>    
    KW>  CK> wanted.. and I'm still trying to figure out why. I think a big portio   
    KW>  CK> of that is how new and modern things look... after many years of trek   
    KW>  CK> In all fairness TOS fans prob felt that way with TNG.   
    KW>    
    KW> I liked the progression from TOS -> TNG, but I wanted Enterprise to look    
    KW> much more primitive. The design of NX-01 looked like a 200 year newer   
    KW> Akira- class ship, and the interiors felt too new. I would have liked   
    KW> those little gooseneck viewers on the helm as a callback to the TOS   
    KW> pilot Enterprise.  :)   
      
   Yes, that was my issue with that series too. In fact, this is in part why I   
   didn't really care too much for ST reboot. I was thinking something more   
   primitive.. simplistic. I suppose its hard to go backwards when the tech and   
   know how is far more advanced.   
   --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2020/12/04 (Linux/64)   
    * Origin: thE qUAntUm wOrmhOlE, rAmsgAtE, uK. bbs.erb.pw (2:250/5)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/0 25/0 21 30/0 80/1 90/1 103/705 105/81 120/340   
   SEEN-BY: 123/131 129/305 218/700 221/1 6 226/30 227/114 229/101 424   
   SEEN-BY: 229/426 428 550 700 1016 1017 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 250/0   
   SEEN-BY: 250/1 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 21 261/38 263/0 280/464 282/464 1038   
   SEEN-BY: 292/854 301/0 1 101 113 123 812 317/3 322/757 335/364 341/66   
   SEEN-BY: 342/200 633/280 920/1 5058/104   
   PATH: 250/5 1 301/1 229/426