Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    TREK    |    Star Trek General Discussions    |    20,898 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,726 of 20,898    |
|    Daniel to Benjamin Toussaint    |
|    Re: Picard    |
|    27 Aug 20 07:52:00    |
      TZUTC: -0700       MSGID: 17373.fido_trek@1:340/7 23ace03c       REPLY: 2:240/8001.19@fidonet e7c12c02       PID: Synchronet 3.18a-Win32 Jun 26 2020 MSC 1925       TID: SBBSecho 3.11-Win32 r3.173 Jun 26 2020 MSC 1925       CHRS: ASCII 1       -=> Benjamin Toussaint wrote to Daniel <=-               > I gave Picard a try after downloading a torrent. After a few episodes I        BT> gave        > up. To me it is an empty shell of TNG. I would do a complete review but        BT> that        > would require a complete viewing of the season.               BT> I am still viewing it. I agree that it is not even close to what Star        BT> Trek TNG was like.        BT> What I specifically loved about that was the exploring mission with few        BT> self centered political issues or combat / battle scenes.        BT> And that almost every single episode made sense on its own. Although        BT> streaming technology makes it impossible to miss an episode, it used to        BT> be like having one philosophical thought discussed within one episode.              I never caught Enterprise. I tried a few episodes and I couldn't get into       it. But the ship did look like an Akira class which rates as among a favorite       type for me.              Plus, I didn't really like the cast.               > Like the reboot movies, the show is made for young people who grew up        > without Star Trek. The franchise is done with, if you ask me. At least I        > have the dvd collections of TOS, TNG, and DS9. I liked Voyager despite        BT> the        > rushed finale season.               BT> Yeah, I liked those as well. Enterprise has too much fighting and from        BT> season 2 it started having a running plot through the whole show. But        BT> still I liked watching it.        BT> But ST - to me - has to be about future and optimism. I cannot find        BT> much of that in Picard or any Prequel.              Yeah, it's generic sci-fi in Star Trek clothes.               > During his promo tour of the talkshow circuit, Stewart said that the        BT> show        > would be specifically written to combat Trump. I knew it was going to be        BT> a        > steaming pile of turds. I'm surprised he didn't cast DeNiro.               BT> Trump is just an expression of losing a common ground of facts and the        BT> impact of believing whatever is pleasant to believe. A sickness of many        BT> democracies nowadays. But something like the TNG series gave hope for a        BT> brighter future to many nerds out there.              Well, Stewart said it was his way of combatting Trump. He made it about       him and his hate and not about the fans. Interesting take you have, but I'm       sure       this isn't a forum for political debate. So I'll keep it at that.               > Star Trek died with Roddenberry.               BT> I would not go that far. But it completely went to the wrong direction        BT> I think.              I was just getting it off my chest.              Disney killed Star Wars and the passage of time killed Star Trek. My two loves       of science fiction and fantasy are history.              ... Visit me at gopher://gcpp.world       --- MultiMail/Linux v0.49        * Origin: Digital Distortion: digdist.synchro.net (1:340/7)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 120/340 123/130 226/30 227/114 229/100 101 275       SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 664 240/5832 249/206 317 292/854 317/3 322/757       SEEN-BY: 342/200 633/280       PATH: 340/7 400 261/38 320/219 203/0 280/464 229/101 426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca