Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    TREK    |    Star Trek General Discussions    |    20,898 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,705 of 20,898    |
|    Al Kaiser to All    |
|    Star Trek Discovery    |
|    31 Mar 20 06:46:24    |
      MSGID: 1:142/926 cd23ac56       PID: TerMail 5/Pro ffa5ca054e       I just finished watching the first two seasons of Star Trek DIscovery on DVD       from Netflix.              It is NOT Gene Roddenberry's Trek! I do not think that he would have approved       of this series. First of all for the language. In all of Trek I only remember       one out and out cuss when the ship was crashing into the planet Data said "Oh       Shit!" This one has out and out swearing including the "F" word. Also open       gay kissing. The suggestion of "gaity" is OK but to have two male or female       character kiss on screen is a no-no. Also there were aliens in this series       that were never seen again in all of Trek. The whole Klingon war thing in the       first season was wrong. This Trek was supposed to be a bridge between       Enterprise with Archer and TOS with Kirk. The war with the Klingons was over       and we were in a truce, a cold war. Remember The Trouble With Tribbles? That       was the way we were with the Klingons. The Klingon makeup and laanguae was all       wrong. The Klingon home planet was wrong. The home planet in Trek was "Kling"       not Kronos. Kronos came later in the series. Finally the out and out       violence. Murder by the fedration? I think not. They made Mudd an out and       out criminal that should have been given the death sentence or at least a life       sentence. They made him a murder rather than just a scrondrel.              Spock, who was a large part of season two never had a step-sister. He had a       half brother who was never mentioned. I saw only three references to TOS one       was Mudd and the other whas when Pike picked up the future Spike and saw       himself disfigured, also Vena and the Talosians were in the mix. They tried       to get back to Trek cannon in the last two scenes in Part II of Sweet Sorrow       when they had a scene on the bridge of the Entrprise as it appease, (modernly),       when Pike was Captain and Spock was the Lt. Science Officer.              THey tried to write off all that happened over the two years by sending the       Discovery and her crew into the future. For anyone left they were resticted       "under penalty of death" of every taking or mentioning Discovery and the events       that happened in the first two seasons. Even Sarek and Amanda were self       quarrentined from talking about it calling them "Ambasadors To the Federation."       Sarek was an Ambasador, Amanda never was.              Was this a two year effort with no more seasons of Discovery? How do you have       a season 3 when Discovery and all her crew is dead or gone?              Well I'm waiting for "Picard" to come out on DVD. A friend says it is very       good and is "good Trek". Though I do have a disagrement that Data was blown       to smithereens in the last movie, but he said that Data was reconstruced from       DNA taken when they tried to disassemble him when Picard fought to call him       sentient. We'll see about that one.              Below the first and only official Discovery tagline I was able to gleen from       the series.               -=> Al Kaiser n1api@cox.net <=-              Cheers!              Al Kaiser - Meriden, CT, 31-Mar-2020 at 6:46.       Fido : 1:142/926 - Internet : n1api@cox.net              .!. Don't make me laugh! Fortunally for you I was raised on Vulcan,       .!. we don't do funny.       --- Terminate 5.00/Pro         * Origin: Terminate point system, the easiest in the world! (1:142/926)       SEEN-BY: 1/19 123 16/0 90/1 123/130 131 142/926 203/0 124 221/0 1       SEEN-BY: 226/16 30 227/114 229/101 275 426 1014 230/0 240/5832 249/206       SEEN-BY: 249/317 261/38 280/464 5003 288/100 292/854 310/31 317/3       SEEN-BY: 320/119 219 322/0 757 342/200 396/45 423/120 633/280 712/848       SEEN-BY: 770/1       PATH: 142/926 320/219 203/0 280/464 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca