TZUTC: -0700   
   MSGID: 17301.fido_trek@1:340/7 213c83f4   
   REPLY: 1:229/101 511a46ca   
   PID: Synchronet 3.17c-Win32  May  4 2019 MSC 1800   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.07-Win32 r3.114 May  4 2019 MSC 1800   
   COLS: 80   
     Re: Re: Thought on Discovery   
     By: Frank Linhares to Eric Oulashin on Fri May 10 2019 09:41 pm   
      
    FL> I think he was only referring to his half sister with records to never   
    FL> speaking of them again, I don't remember anything about Discovery as a   
    FL> whole. Then again, I have been known to be wrong from time to time, lol.   
      
   Maybe that's right, I don't remember for sure now.   
      
    FL> They also never explained this difference between the Klingon's on TOS and   
    FL> TNG. I'd be more curious about that difference since they are both in the   
    FL> same time line.   
      
   Yes actually, they did explain that (at least, to an extent).  And the new   
   Klingon look actually started with The Motion Picture, not TNG.  It was   
   explained in the TV series 'Enterprise'.  They explained it as some genetic   
   manipulations the Klingons were doing to themselves, based on what humans were   
   doing to produce a group of super-humans, which included Khan.  There was a   
   3-part episode in Enterprise where one of Soong's ancestors (also played by   
   Brent Spiner) was continuing the work to create more super-humans, and I think   
   the Klingons got wind of it and tried introducing some of the human super-genes   
   into themselves, which is why the Klingons looked more human in TOS.  I don't   
   remember offhand how the Klingons went back to their regular look by The Motion   
   Picture/TNG, but at least that explains why they looked more human in TOS.   
      
   Nightfox   
   --- SBBSecho 3.07-Win32   
    * Origin: Digital Distortion: digdist.synchro.net (1:340/7)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 2 19/36 34/999 90/1 104/57 106/201 116/18 120/331   
   SEEN-BY: 123/140 153/7715 218/700 222/2 226/16 17 229/101 200 275   
   SEEN-BY: 229/354 426 728 1014 230/150 152 240/1120 5832 249/206 317   
   SEEN-BY: 250/1 261/38 100 266/512 267/155 275/100 280/464 282/1031   
   SEEN-BY: 282/1056 291/1 111 292/854 317/3 320/119 219 322/757 340/400   
   SEEN-BY: 342/13 200 393/68 396/45 633/0 267 280 640/1384 712/620 848   
   SEEN-BY: 770/1 801/189 2320/105 3634/12 5020/1042   
   PATH: 340/7 400 261/38 712/848 633/280 229/426